What are documented transcripts or recordings of Nick Fuentes’ speeches and livestreams referencing Jews or Israel?
Executive summary
Publicly available recordings and published excerpts document repeated instances in which Nick Fuentes references Jews and Israel across livestreams, speeches and high-profile interviews—ranging from a 2021 debate on Alex Jones’s InfoWars to a much‑criticized 2025 sit‑down on Tucker Carlson’s platform—with reporters and watchdogs archiving salient quotes and clips [1] [2] [3]. Major civil‑society monitors and journalists have transcribed or excerpted his remarks (including explicit claims about “Zionist Jews,” dual‑loyalty tropes, praise for Hitler, and Holocaust‑adjacent comments), but full official transcripts are dispersed across media outlets, watchdog reports and circulating video excerpts rather than centralized in one public repository [4] [5] [1].
1. Documented high‑profile interviews and speeches where he addresses Jews or Israel
Several widely cited, recorded appearances contain verbatim lines that reference Jews or Israel: Fuentes’ 2021 exchange on Alex Jones’s InfoWars recording—where he declared Jews “have no place in Western civilization”—is quoted in reporting and archival summaries [1]; his October 2025 interview with Tucker Carlson (post‑airing excerpts and writeups) includes the line blaming “these Zionist Jews” as obstacles within the conservative movement and other passages framing Judaism as incompatible with Western traditions [3] [1]. In addition, watchdogs documented an hour‑long speech in June 2025 in which Fuentes opened with “I love you, and I love Hitler” and targeted “Talmudic Jews,” with the Anti‑Defamation League publishing a detailed account and quotes from the recording [4].
2. Livestreams and long‑form shows: recorded patterns and sample quotations
Multiple long livestream sessions and episodes have been reviewed and excerpted by journalists; The Atlantic’s review of over a dozen hours of Fuentes’ livestreams cites recurring anti‑Jewish themes and records statements such as that “Jews in America … are principally concerned, first and foremost, with the interest and the well‑being and the welfare of their own community—of global Jewry,” while enumerating attacks on named Jewish figures [5]. Reporting and watchdog transcripts repeatedly highlight a pattern: explicit tropes about dual loyalty, claims Jews are “unassimilable” or a separate political bloc, and periodic flirtation with Holocaust‑minimizing or approving language—all of which are present in the recorded material journalists have reviewed [5] [1] [2].
3. How recordings circulate and where to find them (media, watchdogs, social clips)
Recorded segments and translated clips appear across mainstream reporting and in trimmed social clips: outlets such as the AJC, Times of Israel, PBS and The Atlantic have published excerpts and analyses drawing directly from interviews and livestream footage, while the ADL and other civil‑society groups have published verbatim quotes from rally recordings [1] [3] [6] [4]. Separately, short clips from those originals have been repurposed on platforms and in other language markets—most notably Arabic social media where Fuentes’ clips are subtitled or dubbed and circulated as critiques of Israel—making the audiovisual record fragmentary but widely distributed [7].
4. What is documented, and where reporting has limits
The existing public record—news articles, watchdog reports and long‑form media reviews—documents specific sentences and themes from Fuentes’ speeches and livestreams, and links to video excerpts are often embedded in those reports [4] [5] [1]. However, there is no single, authoritative public archive provided by Fuentes that neatly compiles every transcript; researchers rely on media transcriptions, NGO excerpts and archived clips, meaning completeness and context sometimes depend on the outlet doing the reporting [5] [4]. When a claim about a precise line is not present in these sources, reporting notes that limitation rather than asserting its absence.
5. Reception, agendas and amplification: why these recordings matter
The documented recordings have provoked bipartisan condemnation and fractured responses on the right—conservatives including Ben Shapiro and some Republican leaders denounced platforms that amplified Fuentes’ remarks—while others argue engagement is a way to expose extremist views; at the same time, foreign and domestic amplification (e.g., Arabic social feeds reframing clips as anti‑Israel commentary) shows how recorded snippets can be repackaged to serve different political narratives, from mainstreaming anti‑Israel arguments to glorifying antisemitic content [1] [7] [6]. Readers seeking the primary texts should consult the original video excerpts and the detailed quote collections in the cited reporting and watchdog writeups, recognizing the record is distributed across multiple outlets rather than centralized [4] [5].