What evidence first linked JD Vance to the sofa sex rumor and who started it?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The earliest documented spark of the “J.D. Vance had sex with a couch” story was a single joke post on X (formerly Twitter) by user @rickrudescalves on July 15, 2024; that post claimed, as satire, that Vance’s memoir Hillbilly Elegy included a passage about “f***ing an inside-out latex glove shoved between two couch cushions” [1] [2]. Major outlets and fact-checkers — notably Snopes and The Associated Press — quickly treated the claim as false and debunked it, though AP later removed its fact-check after publication, which amplified the meme and widened the rumor’s reach [3] [4] [5].
1. How the rumor began — a single joke on X that went viral
The first visible origin in the reporting is an X post by user @rickrudescalves on July 15, 2024, which framed the couch allegation explicitly as a joke referencing page numbers in Hillbilly Elegy; that tweet is cited repeatedly by Rolling Stone, Vulture and others as the genesis of the meme [1] [2]. Business Insider and NDTV report the same origin and include the author’s later comments that he made it up while shopping and intended it as humor, not reportage [3] [6].
2. Why the joke migrated into a “rumor” rather than staying a joke
Social-media amplification and the tactic of screenshotting or repeating the line as if factual pushed the post beyond satire into rumor territory; some users shared it in ways that treated it as a real citation to the memoir, and that ambiguity aided spread [2] [7]. NPR and Rolling Stone note that X’s lax moderation under its then-owner contributed to rapid circulation of political jokes and falsehoods, and that fact-checks sometimes paradoxically drew more attention to the claim [7] [1].
3. The role of fact-checkers — debunks, a retraction, and the Streisand effect
Snopes published a debunk affirming there is no passage like the one claimed in Vance’s book and traced the post’s wording to the X user [4]. The Associated Press also published a fact-check headlined “No, JD Vance did not have sex with a couch,” but then removed the piece saying it had not passed AP’s editing process; that removal and the publicity around it magnified the meme’s reach and created a Streisand-effect dynamic documented by Rolling Stone, The Verge and Times of India [5] [1] [8].
4. Who “started” it — attribution and intent
Reporting identifies the X user @rickrudescalves (often named in coverage as “Rick” in interviews) as the originator of the specific couch-sex quip; Business Insider and NDTV quote him saying he’s not a political operative, identified with the left, and made the joke because he disliked Vance [3] [6]. Multiple outlets treat that single tweet as the proximate cause of the meme’s viral arc [1] [2].
5. Evidence that it was invented, not reported in the memoir
Fact-checkers and news reports uniformly state there is no passage in Hillbilly Elegy that remotely describes the alleged act; AP’s archived notes and Snopes’s review of the text and pages mentioned found nothing matching the claim [4] [5]. Vulture summarized the consensus bluntly: “probably not” — the supposed episode isn’t in the book, and there’s no independent corroboration [2].
6. Why the story mattered politically and culturally
Coverage shows the meme became a form of political satire and a rhetorical weapon: critics used it to ridicule Vance, while defenders decried it as baseless smear; the debate touched on free-speech limits (The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression noted that parody is protected speech) and on how meme culture can shape candidate narratives [9] [7]. The AP retraction in particular became a talking point about media handling of online rumors and fact checks [5] [1].
7. Limitations in the record and what the sources don’t say
Available sources consistently trace the meme to the X user’s July 15 post and to the subsequent fact-checking and amplification, but they do not present evidence of any earlier origin predating that tweet; if there were private whispers or offline jokes before then, available reporting does not mention them [1] [3]. Also, while outlets cite the tweet author’s stated motives, they do not independently verify his political affiliations beyond his own comments [3] [6].
Bottom line: reporting identifies a single satirical X post by @rickrudescalves as the proximate origin; fact-checkers promptly found the claim false in the book, and the AP’s subsequent removal of its fact-check helped turn an online joke into a broader viral political meme [1] [4] [5].