Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What evidence first linked JD Vance to the sofa sex rumor and who started it?
Executive summary
The earliest documented spark of the “J.D. Vance had sex with a couch” story was a single joke post on X (formerly Twitter) by user @rickrudescalves on July 15, 2024; that post claimed, as satire, that Vance’s memoir Hillbilly Elegy included a passage about “f***ing an inside-out latex glove shoved between two couch cushions” [1] [2]. Major outlets and fact-checkers — notably Snopes and The Associated Press — quickly treated the claim as false and debunked it, though AP later removed its fact-check after publication, which amplified the meme and widened the rumor’s reach [3] [4] [5].
1. How the rumor began — a single joke on X that went viral
The first visible origin in the reporting is an X post by user @rickrudescalves on July 15, 2024, which framed the couch allegation explicitly as a joke referencing page numbers in Hillbilly Elegy; that tweet is cited repeatedly by Rolling Stone, Vulture and others as the genesis of the meme [1] [2]. Business Insider and NDTV report the same origin and include the author’s later comments that he made it up while shopping and intended it as humor, not reportage [3] [6].
2. Why the joke migrated into a “rumor” rather than staying a joke
Social-media amplification and the tactic of screenshotting or repeating the line as if factual pushed the post beyond satire into rumor territory; some users shared it in ways that treated it as a real citation to the memoir, and that ambiguity aided spread [2] [7]. NPR and Rolling Stone note that X’s lax moderation under its then-owner contributed to rapid circulation of political jokes and falsehoods, and that fact-checks sometimes paradoxically drew more attention to the claim [7] [1].
3. The role of fact-checkers — debunks, a retraction, and the Streisand effect
Snopes published a debunk affirming there is no passage like the one claimed in Vance’s book and traced the post’s wording to the X user [4]. The Associated Press also published a fact-check headlined “No, JD Vance did not have sex with a couch,” but then removed the piece saying it had not passed AP’s editing process; that removal and the publicity around it magnified the meme’s reach and created a Streisand-effect dynamic documented by Rolling Stone, The Verge and Times of India [5] [1] [8].
4. Who “started” it — attribution and intent
Reporting identifies the X user @rickrudescalves (often named in coverage as “Rick” in interviews) as the originator of the specific couch-sex quip; Business Insider and NDTV quote him saying he’s not a political operative, identified with the left, and made the joke because he disliked Vance [3] [6]. Multiple outlets treat that single tweet as the proximate cause of the meme’s viral arc [1] [2].
5. Evidence that it was invented, not reported in the memoir
Fact-checkers and news reports uniformly state there is no passage in Hillbilly Elegy that remotely describes the alleged act; AP’s archived notes and Snopes’s review of the text and pages mentioned found nothing matching the claim [4] [5]. Vulture summarized the consensus bluntly: “probably not” — the supposed episode isn’t in the book, and there’s no independent corroboration [2].
6. Why the story mattered politically and culturally
Coverage shows the meme became a form of political satire and a rhetorical weapon: critics used it to ridicule Vance, while defenders decried it as baseless smear; the debate touched on free-speech limits (The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression noted that parody is protected speech) and on how meme culture can shape candidate narratives [9] [7]. The AP retraction in particular became a talking point about media handling of online rumors and fact checks [5] [1].
7. Limitations in the record and what the sources don’t say
Available sources consistently trace the meme to the X user’s July 15 post and to the subsequent fact-checking and amplification, but they do not present evidence of any earlier origin predating that tweet; if there were private whispers or offline jokes before then, available reporting does not mention them [1] [3]. Also, while outlets cite the tweet author’s stated motives, they do not independently verify his political affiliations beyond his own comments [3] [6].
Bottom line: reporting identifies a single satirical X post by @rickrudescalves as the proximate origin; fact-checkers promptly found the claim false in the book, and the AP’s subsequent removal of its fact-check helped turn an online joke into a broader viral political meme [1] [4] [5].