Which specific emails in the Epstein file show Peggy Siegal organizing the December 2010 dinner for Prince Andrew and who has published them?

Checked on February 7, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The Epstein files contain multiple email exchanges showing Peggy Siegal involved in arranging a December 2010 “very last minute casual dinner” at Jeffrey Epstein’s Manhattan residence attended by Prince Andrew; key messages include a Dec. 1, 2010 invitation to George Stephanopoulos promising “private time with Andrew” and a Dec. 3, 2010 message from Siegal to Epstein calling the evening “sensational” and detailing arrangements such as gold chairs and copies of The King’s Speech [1] [2] [3]. Those emails appear in the tranche of documents released by the U.S. Department of Justice and have been excerpted and reported by outlets including The Guardian, Times Now, Daily Mail, The Independent and others [4] [5] [3] [2].

1. Which specific emails identify Siegal as the organizer

Among the emails highlighted by reporting, one message dated around December 1, 2010 from Peggy Siegal to journalist George Stephanopoulos invites him to “a very last minute casual dinner for Prince Andrew” and tells him to “come on time and you will have private time with Andrew as he is staying at the house,” establishing Siegal as the person sending invitations and coordinating guests [1] [6]. Another contemporaneous email from Siegal to Epstein on December 3, 2010 recounts the night as “sensational,” comments on décor (gold ballroom chairs and floral arrangements) and notes that Andrew was given copies of The King’s Speech, linking Siegal to the post-event reporting and logistics [3] [2] [7]. Reporting also cites a separate Siegal-originated guest-list/email thread circulated to Epstein and others describing the event as a “very interesting, fast, fun dinner” for the then-royal visitor [6] [8].

2. What those emails actually say — specifics reported

Excerpts published in multiple outlets show Siegal offering concrete, logistic detail: an invitation phrased to entice high-profile invitees, an explicit note that Andrew was “staying at the house” and therefore available for private time with early-arriving guests, and a post-event line that the evening had been “sensational”; other messages included coordination about seating and flowers and a forwarded November 3, 2010 note arranging a private screening of The King’s Speech for Andrew, all of which portray Siegal as executing hospitality and publicity tasks tied to Epstein’s hosting [1] [3] [2] [7]. These are the specific textual hooks reporters have used to say Siegal organized or mailed invitations for the December 2010 dinner [5] [6].

3. Who published the emails and where they came from

The raw materials for these reports come from the bulk release of Epstein-related documents by the U.S. Department of Justice — a multi-million‑page set that journalists have combed to surface particular email exchanges — and news organizations have excerpted and published the passages in stories [4] [5]. The Guardian prominently reported and contextualized the Siegal emails in its coverage of the DOJ release [5] [6], and outlets including Times Now, Daily Mail, The Independent, Mirror and Filmogaz have published the same or similar excerpts and synopses of the emails [4] [3] [2] [7] [9]. Individual stories reproduce lines and summaries from the DOJ documents rather than hosting a separate original archive link in the reporting aggregated here [4] [5].

4. Limits, competing framings and what remains unverified

Reporting converges on the same email fragments, but the sources available here do not provide direct file names, unique document IDs or full unredacted email headers from the DOJ release that would let independent readers verify chain-of-custody line-by-line; therefore claims rest on journalistic excerpts from the DOJ tranche rather than a hosted primary email file in these citations [4] [5]. Outlets vary in emphasis — some portray Siegal as the explicit organizer, others frame her as a publicist who emailed invitations and logistical notes — and Siegal has defended her role in prior reporting by saying she helped with dinners and events but denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, an alternative viewpoint reflected in coverage and her public statements [10] [8].

5. Bottom line and provenance

The most concrete, repeatedly cited messages are the Dec. 1, 2010 invitation from Peggy Siegal to George Stephanopoulos promising “private time with Andrew” and the Dec. 3, 2010 email from Siegal to Epstein calling the dinner “sensational” and describing decor and gifts — those specific lines appear in multiple news reports drawn from the DOJ’s released Epstein files, with The Guardian, Times Now, Daily Mail, The Independent and others publishing the excerpts [1] [2] [3] [5] [4]. Absent a linked primary DOI or document reference in the available reporting, readers should treat the journalistic excerpts as secondary publications of DOJ-released material and note that full verification would require consulting the DOJ document repository itself or outlet-provided documents that include original headers and file identifiers [4] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
Where can the public access the original DOJ Epstein document release and search specific email threads?
What has Peggy Siegal said publicly in response to the December 2010 dinner emails and how have her clients reacted?
How have major news outlets verified and excerpted documents from the DOJ Epstein release — methodology and differences?