What public petitions, protests, or social media movements targeted Nick Fuentes’ accounts?

1. Platform bans, reinstatements and the public uproar

Major platform decisions have been the focal point for petitions and protest: Fuentes was banned from YouTube for hate speech in 2020 and from several platforms, which reporters and advocacy organizations repeatedly noted as the basis for public pressure to keep him off mainstream services ^{[1] [2]}. When Elon Musk signaled or enacted reinstatement of Fuentes’ X account in 2024–2025, that move produced vigorous online backlash and calls from critics and advocacy groups to re-suspend him, leading to swift suspensions and renewed debate — a pattern documented in news reporting ^{[4] [6]}.

2. Organized petitions and civil-society campaigns

There are explicit petition efforts calling for Fuentes’ removal or dismantling of his infrastructure; for instance, a Change.org petition titled “Dismantle Nicholas J Fuentes for Enciting Violence Against Women And Religious Minorities” sought platform and institutional action against him ^[3]. Beyond single petitions, civil-society pressure has been exerted through coordinated media campaigns and public statements from Jewish, civil‑rights, and mainstream organizations demanding enforcement of hate‑speech policies ^{[7] [2]}.

3. Social media movements and viral protest activity

Social-media reactions — both organic and organized — have been central. When Fuentes’ account was briefly restored or when mainstream figures platformed him (notably a high-profile interview with Tucker Carlson), critics used hashtags, viral threads, and mass denunciations to demand deplatforming and advertiser pressure, while some conservative commentators frame those reactions as censorship or “cancel culture,” amplifying counter-movements defending his access ^{[5] [8] [4]}.

4. Political protests and conservative pushback

Fuentes’ appearances at public rallies (e.g., Stop the Steal / Million MAGA March) and the prominence of his “Groypers” have translated into on‑the‑ground mobilizations that both attracted protesters and inspired counter-protests; reporting places him at those demonstrations and links his following to broader far‑right organizing ^[9]. At the same time, prominent conservative institutions and figures — like Kevin Roberts of the Heritage Foundation or some MAGA-aligned commentators — resisted calls to “cancel” voices, arguing for allowing controversial interviews and contesting platform moderation ^{[5] [10]}.

5. Media, advertisers and platform accountability as pressure levers

Journalists and watchdogs chronicle how advertiser pressure and reputational risk drive platform enforcement: media coverage of Fuentes’ rhetoric and courtroom or policy consequences often sparked advertiser and public pressure, which in turn influenced platform actions ^{[2] [4]}. Conversely, when platform owners or hosts defended reinstatement on free‑speech grounds, advertisers and some conservatives criticized the backlash as politically motivated ^{[4] [5]}.

6. Competing narratives and where reporting disagrees

Reporting converges that Fuentes has been widely deplatformed for hate speech and that his partial reinstatements fuel controversy ^{[1] [4]}. Where sources diverge is on remedies: many outlets and advocacy groups pressed for permanent exclusion from major platforms and payments networks ^{[2] [7]}, while other commentators and some conservative leaders argued reinstatement or platform neutrality is preferable to censorship, framing petitions and protests as part of broader culture‑war tactics ^{[5] [8]}.

7. What the sources do not document

Available sources do not mention a comprehensive list cataloguing every single petition, protest date, or social‑media hashtag campaign targeting Fuentes’ accounts; reporting shows notable examples (Change.org petition, platform suspensions/reinstatements, public backlash after the Carlson interview) but does not provide an exhaustive ledger of grassroots actions ^{[3] [4] [5]}.

8. Bottom line for researchers and readers

If you’re tracking pressure on Fuentes’ online presence, focus on three mechanisms documented in reporting: platform moderation actions (bans/reinstatements), civil‑society petitions/campaigns (e.g., Change.org and advocacy groups), and high‑visibility media events (notably the Tucker Carlson interview) that trigger waves of social‑media protest and political pushback ^{[1] [3] [5]}. These recurring dynamics, reported across outlets, create the cycle of protests and petitions you’re asking about — but an authoritative, exhaustive list of every petition or protest is not available in the cited reporting ^{[3] [5]}.