Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Have fact-checkers or archival services (e.g., AP, Reuters, C-SPAN) confirmed or debunked the 'piggy' audio/video?
Executive summary
Major news outlets and multiple fact‑checking sites treated the audio/video of the Air Force One gaggle as authentic and have reported that President Trump said “Quiet, quiet, piggy” to a female reporter (identified by several outlets as Bloomberg’s Catherine Lucey) during an exchange about the Jeffrey Epstein files; Lead Stories, Snopes and mainstream outlets including CNN, The Guardian and Reuters‑style reporting reproduced or described the White House video and contemporaneous reporting [1] [2] [3] [4]. The clip was posted by the White House and widely circulated; reporting and fact‑checks conclude the footage shows the remark on Nov. 14, 2025 [2] [5] [6].
1. What the archival and fact‑checking record shows: authenticated clip on official feed
The White House posted video of the November 14 Air Force One gaggle and news outlets extracted a short segment in which the president interrupts a female reporter and says, “Quiet. Quiet, piggy,” while gesturing; Lead Stories and Yahoo’s fact checks reviewed the official footage and concluded the remark occurred as shown [1] [6] [5]. CNN and other outlets ran the same clip and described the context — a reporter pressing about whether Epstein emails contained incriminating material — signalling convergence between broadcasters and fact‑checkers that the recording is genuine [3] [7].
2. Who has confirmed or debunked it — and how they framed it
Fact‑checking sites Lead Stories and Snopes examined the footage and surrounding reporting and treated the clip as authentic, explicitly stating the president said the phrase and identifying the exchange’s date [1] [2]. Major news organizations (CNN, The Guardian, The Independent, The Telegraph and others) published video and transcripts or quoted the line, not as a disputed manipulation but as a news item about presidential conduct [3] [4] [8] [9]. Available sources do not mention any archival service (for example, C‑SPAN or AP archives) producing an independent forensic debunking that calls the clip fake; instead, reporting notes the White House’s own posting of the video [5].
3. Attribution and the identity of the reporter
Multiple outlets identify the targeted reporter as Bloomberg’s Catherine Lucey, citing on‑the‑scene accounts from CBS News reporter Jennifer Jacobs and video context; several reports note Lucey began to ask a follow‑up about incriminating material when she was cut off [10] [6] [11]. News organizations vary in how directly they name her in headlines and copy, but the prevailing reporting attributes the exchange to a Bloomberg correspondent [6] [11].
4. How news organizations and fact‑checkers contextualized the incident
Reporters and fact‑checkers placed the remark in a broader narrative: it followed questions about the Epstein files and came as Congress considered release measures; outlets highlighted both the substance (pressing on possible incriminating material) and the tone (a demeaning insult toward a female journalist), citing video and eyewitness threads from reporters on the plane [5] [10] [3]. Some pieces linked the insult to Trump’s historical use of “pig”‑related epithets, quoting prior allegations and past remarks to illustrate pattern or context [4] [12].
5. What critics, defenders and newsrooms said
News outlets recorded immediate backlash on social platforms and statements from newsrooms; Bloomberg and other journalists condemned the remark as unacceptable, while a White House spokesperson defended the president’s behavior in palatable terms for allies, per coverage [13] [12]. Reporting presented both condemnations from media figures and the White House defense — demonstrating competing public positions rather than a single institutional adjudication [13] [12].
6. Limits of the available reporting and remaining questions
Available sources consistently treat the clip as authentic and do not report a forensic dispute claiming deepfake or manipulation [1] [2] [3]. However, the sources provided do not include an explicit archival audit by C‑SPAN, AP’s archive unit, or a dedicated forensic lab declaring chain‑of‑custody beyond the White House posting; in short, authoritative news and fact‑check outlets confirm the content seen on the White House video, but “available sources do not mention” an independent archival forensic certification from every archival service requested [5] [1].
7. Takeaway for readers seeking verification
If your question is whether major fact‑checkers and mainstream outlets confirmed the clip as showing Trump saying “Quiet, piggy,” the record is clear: multiple fact‑checks and broadcasters reproduced and verified the White House video and described the exchange as authentic [1] [3] [6]. If you are seeking a specialized archival or forensic statement from AP archives, C‑SPAN, or a forensic lab beyond the outlets cited, that is not found in current reporting provided here — those organizations are not recorded in these sources as issuing a separate debunk or forensic certification [5] [2].