Which specific Podesta emails reference the Edible Schoolyard or related fundraisers, and can they be read in full on the WikiLeaks site?
Executive summary
A targeted review of the provided reporting finds no Podesta email explicitly referencing the Edible Schoolyard or fundraisers tied to that program; the nearest documented items are emails and public reporting about Podesta-hosted fundraisers for his daughter’s school-board campaign and the full Podesta corpus posted by WikiLeaks (which can be browsed on the WikiLeaks Podesta index) [1] [2]. Reporting also stresses debates over the provenance and authenticity of the Podesta dump, a caveat for anyone interpreting specific items from the archive [3] [4].
1. What this question really asks and why that matters
The user seeks two discrete facts: which exact Podesta emails mention the Edible Schoolyard or related fundraisers, and whether those documents are viewable in full on WikiLeaks; answering requires (a) locating specific email text that contains the phrase or clear reference to “Edible Schoolyard” or to fundraisers run explicitly for that program and (b) confirming the document IDs and availability on the WikiLeaks Podesta page [2]. Without a cited match in the reporting, asserting specific document numbers or text would overreach the sources provided [2] [3].
2. What the reporting actually contains about fundraisers and Podesta’s emails
The assembled sources document that WikiLeaks published thousands of Podesta emails and that the full Podesta archive is hosted on the WikiLeaks site [2] [3], and investigative reporting used that dump to identify a range of topics from mundane logistics to campaign strategy [4] [5]. Independent coverage also highlighted at least one specific fundraiser tied to Podesta—a 2014 fundraiser at Tony Podesta’s home that supported John Podesta’s daughter’s local school-board campaign, reported in published coverage using the WikiLeaks material and campaign finance filings [1].
3. Direct search for “Edible Schoolyard” in the provided reporting and results
None of the supplied sources — the WikiLeaks Podesta index, mainstream summaries (BBC, The Guardian, Politico), or the Forbes coverage of Podesta fundraisers — mention the Edible Schoolyard by name or point to an email containing that phrase or an identical program-specific fundraiser [2] [4] [5] [1] [6]. Therefore, based on the available reporting, there is no documented Podesta email citing Edible Schoolyard to quote or list here [2] [1].
4. Can the relevant Podesta emails be read in full on WikiLeaks?
WikiLeaks hosts the Podesta email archive and it is possible to read individual messages and full documents on the WikiLeaks Podesta emails index, which is the canonical location linked by reporting on the dumps [2]. That said, whether any particular message referencing Edible Schoolyard exists in the archive cannot be confirmed from the supplied materials; a direct search of the WikiLeaks Podesta index is necessary to verify document-level availability or to retrieve full text [2].
5. Context and cautions about using the WikiLeaks Podesta corpus
Any researcher should note longstanding disputes and official assessments about how the Podesta files were obtained and about authenticity: reporting summarizes that U.S. intelligence and cybersecurity firms linked the Podesta hack to Russian actors and that authenticity questions and potential manipulations were debated in public coverage, which affects how individual emails should be interpreted [3] [7]. Fact-checking outlets have also documented fabricated emails attributed to Podesta circulating separately from the WikiLeaks corpus, a reminder to confirm document IDs and source pages rather than relying on secondary posts or screenshots [8].
6. Practical next steps for verification
To definitively answer whether any Podesta email references Edible Schoolyard and to read it in full, perform a targeted search on the WikiLeaks Podesta index for “Edible Schoolyard,” related organization names, or fundraiser terms and then open the specific document page on WikiLeaks; if search returns no results, it would support the finding that no such explicit reference appears in the published Podesta dump as reported here [2]. If a document is located, note its exact document number and URL on WikiLeaks and cross-check with independent reporting or campaign finance records for corroboration because of the historical concerns about provenance and fabricated documents [3] [8].