What is the political leaning of media conglomerates like News Corp and ViacomCBS?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Media conglomerates’ political leanings are not uniform and are described differently by analysts: News Corporation and its outlets are frequently characterized as conservative-leaning, including documented donations to Republican groups [1]; Viacom/ViacomCBS/Paramount Global and its broadcast outlets are often characterized as centrist or left-leaning in audience/content measures and corporate profiles [2] [3] [4]. Coverage and academic work stress that ownership, audience, and individual outlet practices can diverge, leaving “media conglomerate” as an imprecise label [5] [6].
1. Ownership versus outlet behavior — the difference that matters
Academic and journalistic discussion distinguishes between the politics of corporate owners and the partisan slant of individual outlets: corporate ownership may push agendas but that effect is “subordinated to corporate interests” and manifests unevenly across brands, beats, and formats [5]. That means a conglomerate’s stated donations, board decisions, or flagship outlets might lean right or left while other properties within the same company do not [5] [2].
2. News Corp: ownership and conservative associations
News Corporation — the Murdoch-led group behind outlets such as the Fox news ecosystem in its wider corporate history — is repeatedly described in reporting as having conservative leanings; critics point to political donations such as a $1 million gift to the Republican Governors Association as evidence of partisan alignment [1]. Wikipedia’s entry on News Corporation mentions Democratic criticism that the company’s outlets have conservative leanings, connecting corporate acts to perceived editorial posture [1].
3. Viacom/ViacomCBS/Paramount Global: mixed signals and audience measures
The companies formed by the Redstone family (Viacom, CBS, the merged ViacomCBS now called Paramount Global) control a range of entertainment and news properties whose political character varies. Organizational histories emphasize corporate control and re-mergers rather than consistent ideological posture [2]. Assessments of individual properties show a range — for example, CBS News is described as leaning left by some media-rating sites [3], and a local ViacomCBS affiliate was rated as slightly left-leaning by a media-bias monitor [4].
4. Donations and corporate politics: measurable but partial evidence
Campaign contribution databases and watchdogs (e.g., OpenSecrets) are often used to map corporate political giving; profiles exist for Paramount/Viacom donations and lobbying but these data alone do not settle the question of editorial bias [7]. The Hill’s reporting highlights Viacom explicitly denying plans to launch a conservative news channel, noting corporate messaging can be defensive and reactive to public narratives about partisanship [8].
5. Audience alignment versus editorial slant — Pew’s audience-centered approach
Recent research emphasizes that audience composition often reveals more about perceived bias than does ownership: Pew’s 2025 study maps which outlets have right- or left-leaning audiences but cautions that it “does not categorize the content of each news source by its political lean” — meaning audience inclination is a separate metric from editorial policy [6]. So an outlet owned by a conglomerate may attract a partisan audience without explicit corporate direction, complicating simple labels.
6. Competing interpretations and partisan critics
Observers disagree about whether mainstream corporate media are mainly right-leaning or left-leaning. Longstanding critiques argue corporate media tend to lean right by subordinating coverage to corporate interests [5], while other commentators and watchdogs judge broadcast entities like CBS as left-leaning in practice [3] [4]. Partisan critics — e.g., conservative media watchers or liberal sites like DailyKos — push alternative narratives about overall media trends, illustrating that assessments often reflect the critic’s own perspective as much as outlet behavior [9].
7. What’s provable from available reporting — and what isn’t
Available sources document: News Corporation has been characterized as conservative-leaning and made notable Republican donations [1]; Viacom/ViacomCBS/Paramount Global’s corporate history and constituency are complex and individual properties have been labeled left-leaning by some monitors [2] [3] [4]; audience studies map partisan consumption but do not equate to editorial intent [6]. Available sources do not mention uniform, company-wide editorial manifestos declaring a single political line for either conglomerate — assessments depend on which outlets, donations, and audience measures you prioritize [5] [7] [8].
8. How to judge for yourself — practical steps
To form a grounded view, consult multiple kinds of evidence: corporate political donations and lobbying records (OpenSecrets profiles) for owner-level alignment [7]; independent media-bias assessments for outlet-level editorial lean [4] [3]; and audience studies like Pew to understand who consumes each outlet [6]. Cross-check claims — companies will sometimes deny plans or narratives publicly (as Viacom did regarding a conservative channel) so watch both corporate statements and independent reporting [8].
Bottom line: reporting and watchdog data show News Corp is commonly linked to conservative leanings through donations and critiques of its outlets [1], while Viacom/ViacomCBS/Paramount’s properties are assessed more variably and often described as center to left at the outlet level, with important exceptions and divergent audience trends [2] [3] [4] [6].