Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What is the political leaning of media conglomerates like News Corp and ViacomCBS?
Executive summary
Media conglomerates’ political leanings are not uniform and are described differently by analysts: News Corporation and its outlets are frequently characterized as conservative-leaning, including documented donations to Republican groups [1]; Viacom/ViacomCBS/Paramount Global and its broadcast outlets are often characterized as centrist or left-leaning in audience/content measures and corporate profiles [2] [3] [4]. Coverage and academic work stress that ownership, audience, and individual outlet practices can diverge, leaving “media conglomerate” as an imprecise label [5] [6].
1. Ownership versus outlet behavior — the difference that matters
Academic and journalistic discussion distinguishes between the politics of corporate owners and the partisan slant of individual outlets: corporate ownership may push agendas but that effect is “subordinated to corporate interests” and manifests unevenly across brands, beats, and formats [5]. That means a conglomerate’s stated donations, board decisions, or flagship outlets might lean right or left while other properties within the same company do not [5] [2].
2. News Corp: ownership and conservative associations
News Corporation — the Murdoch-led group behind outlets such as the Fox news ecosystem in its wider corporate history — is repeatedly described in reporting as having conservative leanings; critics point to political donations such as a $1 million gift to the Republican Governors Association as evidence of partisan alignment [1]. Wikipedia’s entry on News Corporation mentions Democratic criticism that the company’s outlets have conservative leanings, connecting corporate acts to perceived editorial posture [1].
3. Viacom/ViacomCBS/Paramount Global: mixed signals and audience measures
The companies formed by the Redstone family (Viacom, CBS, the merged ViacomCBS now called Paramount Global) control a range of entertainment and news properties whose political character varies. Organizational histories emphasize corporate control and re-mergers rather than consistent ideological posture [2]. Assessments of individual properties show a range — for example, CBS News is described as leaning left by some media-rating sites [3], and a local ViacomCBS affiliate was rated as slightly left-leaning by a media-bias monitor [4].
4. Donations and corporate politics: measurable but partial evidence
Campaign contribution databases and watchdogs (e.g., OpenSecrets) are often used to map corporate political giving; profiles exist for Paramount/Viacom donations and lobbying but these data alone do not settle the question of editorial bias [7]. The Hill’s reporting highlights Viacom explicitly denying plans to launch a conservative news channel, noting corporate messaging can be defensive and reactive to public narratives about partisanship [8].
5. Audience alignment versus editorial slant — Pew’s audience-centered approach
Recent research emphasizes that audience composition often reveals more about perceived bias than does ownership: Pew’s 2025 study maps which outlets have right- or left-leaning audiences but cautions that it “does not categorize the content of each news source by its political lean” — meaning audience inclination is a separate metric from editorial policy [6]. So an outlet owned by a conglomerate may attract a partisan audience without explicit corporate direction, complicating simple labels.
6. Competing interpretations and partisan critics
Observers disagree about whether mainstream corporate media are mainly right-leaning or left-leaning. Longstanding critiques argue corporate media tend to lean right by subordinating coverage to corporate interests [5], while other commentators and watchdogs judge broadcast entities like CBS as left-leaning in practice [3] [4]. Partisan critics — e.g., conservative media watchers or liberal sites like DailyKos — push alternative narratives about overall media trends, illustrating that assessments often reflect the critic’s own perspective as much as outlet behavior [9].
7. What’s provable from available reporting — and what isn’t
Available sources document: News Corporation has been characterized as conservative-leaning and made notable Republican donations [1]; Viacom/ViacomCBS/Paramount Global’s corporate history and constituency are complex and individual properties have been labeled left-leaning by some monitors [2] [3] [4]; audience studies map partisan consumption but do not equate to editorial intent [6]. Available sources do not mention uniform, company-wide editorial manifestos declaring a single political line for either conglomerate — assessments depend on which outlets, donations, and audience measures you prioritize [5] [7] [8].
8. How to judge for yourself — practical steps
To form a grounded view, consult multiple kinds of evidence: corporate political donations and lobbying records (OpenSecrets profiles) for owner-level alignment [7]; independent media-bias assessments for outlet-level editorial lean [4] [3]; and audience studies like Pew to understand who consumes each outlet [6]. Cross-check claims — companies will sometimes deny plans or narratives publicly (as Viacom did regarding a conservative channel) so watch both corporate statements and independent reporting [8].
Bottom line: reporting and watchdog data show News Corp is commonly linked to conservative leanings through donations and critiques of its outlets [1], while Viacom/ViacomCBS/Paramount’s properties are assessed more variably and often described as center to left at the outlet level, with important exceptions and divergent audience trends [2] [3] [4] [6].