Which public figures have invited or amplified Julie Green, and how have they responded when specific prophecies drew criticism?
Executive summary
Julie Green has been publicly amplified by at least two identifiable political-religious platforms: Doug Mastriano’s campaign, which booked her to speak at a rally, and the ReAwaken America Tour network and affiliated MAGA/QAnon-adjacent circles that have promoted her prophecies [1] [2] [3]. When her specific, date-driven prophecies drew widespread criticism, the response came overwhelmingly from journalists and other religious leaders who labeled her claims false or dangerous, while the public figures and organizers who amplified her have not left a clear, consistent public record defending or repudiating those prophecies in the sources reviewed [3] [1] [2] [4].
1. Who invited or amplified Julie Green: campaigns, tours and online platforms
The clearest, documentable invitation came from Doug Mastriano’s campaign, which featured Green speaking at a public campaign event, a fact reported and analyzed in Rolling Stone [1]. Separately, Green has been a recurring presence on the ReAwaken America Tour circuit and allied events, a touring platform for right-wing Christian media that has repeatedly showcased prophetic speakers and amplified their claims to politically conservative audiences [2] [4]. More broadly, observers and researchers place Green within a constellation of MAGA and QAnon-adjacent online ecosystems that amplify her videos and written prophecies, a dynamic noted by commentator Diana Butler Bass and summarized in coverage pointing to how Green’s messages resonate within those movements [3].
2. How mainstream and religious critics have responded to her prophecies
Coverage in outlets including Rolling Stone, Media Matters, and the Washington Post framed several of Green’s high-profile prophecies — such as claims about deaths of major political figures and conspiratorial assertions about Biden and Obama — as false or “bunk,” prompting critical journalism that traced factual errors and implausible claims [3] [1]. Religious leaders and watchdog organizations likewise pushed back: local podcasts and religious commentators publicly labeled Green a “false prophet,” debating theological standards for prophecy and citing missed predictions as disqualifying evidence [2]. Faith advocacy groups such as Faithful America also catalogued Green as part of a cluster of figures associated with the “New Apostolic” scene and ReAwaken America events, using that framing to criticize the influence of prophetic rhetoric on politics [4].
3. How sponsors and hosts reacted — scarce direct defenses, pervasive silence in the record
There is a notable gap in the public record about direct defenses from the politicians and tour organizers who gave Green platforms: Rolling Stone documents the Mastriano campaign’s decision to have her speak but does not record a robust public defense from Mastriano or his campaign addressing the subsequent criticism of her prophecies [1]. Similarly, reporting that links Green to ReAwaken America and allied tour stages documents amplification, but the sources reviewed do not provide clear statements from tour organizers explicitly defending or disavowing Green’s specific failed or controversial prophecies [2] [4]. Given that absence, any claim that hosts uniformly stood by or repudiated her prophecies would exceed the evidence available in the provided reporting.
4. Motives, agendas and the public conversation around prophetic performance
Analysts such as Diana Butler Bass situate Green’s rise in a longer history of charismatic, politically engaged prophetic figures who articulate the resentments and aspirations of a disaffected constituency; that framing implies an agenda beyond literal prediction — one of political mobilization and identity affirmation for certain conservative Christians [3]. Opponents and some religious leaders argue that the substantive harm comes from specific, date-driven death predictions that feed misinformation and political extremism, prompting media investigations and theological rebukes [3] [2]. Meanwhile, Green’s own ministry maintains an online archive of videos and prophecies, which functions both as amplification and as a record that supporters cite when disputing critics [5] [6].
5. Bottom line and limits of the sourced record
The sourced reporting confirms that Doug Mastriano’s campaign and the ReAwaken America tour network are among the public amplifiers of Julie Green, and that journalists and religious critics have strongly challenged her high-profile prophecies [1] [2] [3] [4]. However, the records provided do not contain comprehensive, on-the-record rebuttals or sustained defenses from the specific politicians and organizers who booked or broadcast her, so any definitive claim about their post-criticism responses cannot be made without additional reporting beyond these sources [1] [2].