Have deepfake videos of Rachel Maddow been posted to YouTube in November 2025?

1. What the provided reporting does show: prior deepfakes and a YouTube example

A 2025 online post singled out a YouTube video titled "Rachel Maddow | SHOCKING DOJ Revolt..." and called the on‑screen “Rachel Maddow” appearance into question as a deepfake or misleading clip, demonstrating that impersonations of Maddow were already present on YouTube in 2025 ^[1]. Independent commentary and industry pieces have also used Maddow as an example subject in broader discussions of synthetic media and the difficulty of distinguishing real from machine‑generated clips ^[3].

2. Maddow and her program publicly addressing AI‑generated false stories

Rachel Maddow herself addressed a wave of AI‑generated fake stories centering on her on a July 22, 2025 episode of The Rachel Maddow Show podcast, reviewing examples of fabricated narratives circulated on social platforms and treating the phenomenon as widespread ^[2]. That program illustrates mainstream media attention to the problem and an explicit acknowledgment by Maddow of false, AI‑linked content using her likeness ^[2].

3. What’s not in the supplied sources: November 2025 YouTube uploads

The materials you provided contain no reporting, listings, or timestamps that specifically confirm deepfake videos of Rachel Maddow being posted to YouTube in November 2025; available sources do not mention November 2025 or catalog uploads from that month (available sources do not mention November 2025) ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

4. Broader context on deepfakes and news presenters in the sources

A research figure and commentary included in the set show that news presenters — including Maddow — are commonly used in studies of images and non‑live video, reflecting both the interest of researchers and the vulnerability of recognizable TV personalities to synthesized content ^[4]. Industry commentary emphasizes that generative models (GANs, autoencoders) have advanced enough to produce believable synthetic media, complicating verification ^{[4] [3]}.

5. Competing perspectives and agendas in the supplied reporting

The Daily Kos post (flagging a YouTube video) functions as a user‑level alert — an advocacy/community perspective aimed at drawing attention to a specific clip — while Rachel Maddow’s own podcast episode is a media actor responding to the phenomenon and framing it as a broader attack on veracity and reputations ^{[1] [2]}. The research and industry pieces adopt a technical/analytical stance, emphasizing capability and risk ^{[4] [3]}. These differing roles — watchdog, affected party, researcher — produce different emphases: immediacy and alarm (community post), first‑hand rebuttal and context (podcast), and systemic analysis (research/industry) ^{[1] [2] [4]}.

6. Limits of the evidence and recommended next steps

Because the provided sources stop in mid‑2025 and do not include a YouTube archive search or catalog of November 2025 uploads, they cannot confirm whether deepfake videos of Rachel Maddow appeared on YouTube in November 2025 (available sources do not mention November 2025) ^{[1] [2] [3]}. To answer your original question conclusively you should: (a) search YouTube with date filters for November 2025 and review uploader notes and metadata, (b) consult fact‑checking outlets or archives (e.g., AP Fact Check, Snopes) for that month, and (c) check direct statements from Rachel Maddow or MSNBC published in November 2025 for any takedown notices or clarifications.

Sources cited: Daily Kos post flagging a YouTube clip ^[1]; research/technical context on news presenters and deepfake tech ^{[4] [3]}; Rachel Maddow podcast episode addressing AI‑generated fake stories ^[2].