Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Is factually right wing leaning?

Checked on August 20, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Based on the provided analyses, there is no direct evidence that Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) itself has a right-wing leaning bias. The analyses reveal a significant gap in available information about MBFC's own political orientation:

  • Multiple sources explicitly state they do not provide information on whether Media Bias/Fact Check is right-wing leaning [1] [2]
  • One source mentions that MBFC "rates various sources as least biased, left, right, or pro-science, but does not provide its own bias" [3]

The analyses appear to have diverged from the original question, instead focusing on:

  • General discussions about identifying right-wing news sources [4] [5]
  • Social media companies' handling of misinformation and their alleged rightward shift [6]
  • Studies showing conservative users share more low-quality information [7]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The analyses fail to address several crucial aspects needed to properly evaluate MBFC's potential bias:

  • No examination of MBFC's methodology or how they determine bias ratings for other sources
  • Missing analysis of MBFC's funding sources or organizational structure that could reveal potential conflicts of interest
  • Absence of comparative analysis with other fact-checking organizations
  • No discussion of criticism MBFC has received from either conservative or liberal perspectives
  • Lack of examination of MBFC's rating patterns - whether they consistently rate certain types of sources more harshly

The analyses also miss important context about who might benefit from questioning fact-checking organizations' neutrality - political actors and media organizations that receive unfavorable ratings would have financial and reputational incentives to challenge the credibility of fact-checkers.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself contains an implicit assumption that may constitute bias. By asking "Is factually right wing leaning?" rather than "What is the political orientation of Media Bias/Fact Check?" the question presupposes that MBFC has a political lean and specifically suggests it might be rightward.

This framing could reflect:

  • Confirmation bias - seeking to confirm a pre-existing belief about MBFC's orientation
  • Political motivation - attempting to discredit a fact-checking organization by questioning its neutrality

The complete lack of relevant data in the analyses [1] [2] [3] suggests that definitive claims about MBFC's political orientation cannot be substantiated based on the available evidence, making any assertion about their bias potentially misleading without proper investigation.

Want to dive deeper?
How do fact-checking organizations evaluate right-wing news sources?
What are the most common biases in right-wing media coverage?
Can right-wing leaning media influence public opinion on social issues?
Which right-wing news outlets have been accused of spreading misinformation?
How does the right-wing media landscape compare to left-wing media in terms of bias?