Are there archived screenshots or reliable fact-checks of rob reiner's 2025 posts mentioning trump?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Multiple major news outlets document that President Donald Trump posted an inflammatory message on Truth Social after Rob Reiner and his wife were found dead on Dec. 14–15, 2025; Trump wrote that the deaths were “reportedly due to the anger he caused … TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME,” and that post drew immediate bipartisan condemnation [1] [2] [3]. The reporting includes direct quotations of Trump’s post and notes that police arrested the Reiners’ son and had not released a motive, meaning the president’s claim was unsubstantiated in contemporary coverage [4] [2].
1. What the contemporaneous reporting records — Trump’s post and its text
News organizations quote the same Truth Social passage attributed to Trump: calling Rob Reiner “a tortured and struggling, but once very talented” figure and saying he and his wife “passed away … reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction … TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME” [1] [5]. Multiple outlets reproduced the passage verbatim and described the post as having politicized a fatal incident [6] [2].
2. Fact checks and archival evidence available in the reporting
The current reporting from Reuters, AP, Washington Post, CNN, Axios, Variety and others functions as contemporaneous documentation of the post — each quotes Trump’s message and cites it as a Truth Social post, effectively serving as archived evidence of both the content and the backlash [7] [2] [4] [6] [3] [1]. None of the cited pieces claims to host a screenshot archive themselves; they reproduce text and describe the post rather than embedding a persistent, publisher-hosted image archive [1] [4].
3. What outlets said about accuracy and whether the claim was substantiated
News outlets uniformly treated Trump’s linking of Reiner’s death to his politics as unsubstantiated. AP characterized the claim as “unsubstantiated” and noted investigators had released little information and that the son was arrested, with no publicly disclosed motive [2]. The Washington Post and Reuters emphasized that authorities had not tied the killings to Reiner’s political views and that the post injected politics into a family tragedy [4] [7].
4. Reactions, bipartisan condemnation and political context
Reporting shows swift bipartisan condemnation, including criticism from Republicans such as Rep. Thomas Massie, who called Trump’s comments “inappropriate and disrespectful,” and other GOP figures distancing themselves from celebrating the killings [3] [8] [9]. Outlets framed the reaction as broad and immediate — celebrities, lawmakers and media organizations all criticized the president’s post [8] [6].
5. On archived screenshots and formal fact-checks — what sources do and do not show
Available sources reproduce Trump’s text and attribute it to Truth Social, but the provided reporting does not link to or host a dedicated archival screenshot repository of the original post; they quote it directly and describe its platform origin [1] [5]. The set of articles in these search results treats the post as public and quotable; none in this collection is presented as a specialized fact-checking organization issuing a formal verdict labeled “true/false” beyond calling the linkage unsubstantiated [2] [4]. Therefore: archived screenshots are not explicitly linked in the cited stories, and no dedicated fact-check entity’s formal ruling is present in these results [1] [6] [2].
6. How to corroborate or archive the post yourself (based on reporting practices)
To build an archival record consistent with journalistic norms seen in these articles, capture the Truth Social post (screenshot or archive URL) and save the publishing metadata (timestamp, permalink) before platforms remove it; cite contemporaneous reporting that reproduced the text (e.g., Reuters, AP, Washington Post) to corroborate the content if the original is taken down [7] [2] [4]. The reporting here demonstrates that major outlets copied the post verbatim, which strengthens the evidentiary trail even if a direct screenshot link is not provided in these stories [1] [5].
7. Limits of the available reporting and unanswered questions
The reporting makes clear investigators had not disclosed a motive and that the son was arrested, so there was no evidentiary basis in these articles to support Trump’s causal claim linking Reiner’s politics to the killings [4] [2]. Available sources do not mention a registered public archive (e.g., the Wayback Machine or a newsroom-hosted image) that preserves Trump’s Truth Social post; they do not include a formal fact-check organization’s side-by-side evaluation in the material provided here [1] [6].
Bottom line: Major outlets contemporaneously reproduced and documented Trump’s Truth Social post and described it as unsubstantiated and widely condemned; those articles constitute reliable contemporaneous records, but the provided reporting does not itself host a public screenshot archive or a standalone fact-check verdict within this collection [1] [2] [4].