Did Rob Reiner make any social media posts about Trump in 2025 and what did they say?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social on Dec. 15, 2025, reacting to the deaths of Rob Reiner and his wife by blaming Reiner’s “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” writing that the couple died “reportedly due to the anger he caused others” and calling Reiner a “tortured and struggling, but once very talented” figure [1] [2]. The post drew immediate bipartisan backlash, including rebukes from Republican lawmakers and conservative commentators, who called it inappropriate and politicizing a homicide under investigation [3] [4].
1. What Trump posted — the language and platform
Trump’s message appeared on his Truth Social account and explicitly linked Reiner’s outspoken criticism of the president to the couple’s deaths: he said Reiner “has passed away… reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME” and described Reiner as having a “raging obsession” with him before concluding “May Rob and Michele rest in peace!” [1] [5].
2. Immediate factual context around the deaths
Reporting cited by outlets in the available sources says Rob Reiner and his wife Michele were found dead in their Brentwood home and the Los Angeles Police Department is treating the scene as an apparent homicide; their son, Nick Reiner, was arrested and held on bail in connection with the investigation [6] [5]. Multiple outlets note there was no publicly reported evidence at the time that the killings were politically motivated [7].
3. Political fallout — Republican and conservative pushback
Trump’s post provoked criticism across the political spectrum, including from Republican members of Congress who said the tone was inappropriate given the ongoing homicide investigation. Representatives such as Thomas Massie and Don Bacon called the post disrespectful or “not Presidential,” and some prominent conservative figures publicly rebuked the president for politicizing the tragedy [3] [8].
4. Media and cultural coverage — consensus and variations
Major news outlets characterized Trump’s message as an inflammatory political attack delivered hours after the deaths were reported. Coverage emphasized the juxtaposition between Trump’s post and tributes from other public figures, including former President Barack Obama, and highlighted how Trump framed Reiner’s death in the language of “TDS” (Trump Derangement Syndrome) [9] [10]. Some outlets underscore that even right-leaning commentators reacted negatively, while others detailed broader debate among MAGA-aligned voices about appropriate responses [11] [12].
5. What the sources do and do not establish
Available reporting documents the Truth Social post and its full quoted language, the arrest of the Reiners’ son, the LAPD’s homicide inquiry, and the political backlash that followed [1] [6] [3]. Available sources do not mention any verified evidence that the killings were motivated by Reiner’s political views or that his criticism of Trump was causally linked to the homicide; outlets note those claims were unsubstantiated at the time [7] [9].
6. Competing narratives and implicit agendas
Two competing frames emerge in the coverage: one presented by Trump and reiterated on his platform, which interprets Reiner’s activism as a provocation that allegedly led to his death [1]; the other, advanced by multiple news organizations and some GOP figures, treats the president’s linkage as opportunistic politicization of a family tragedy and notes the ongoing criminal investigation pointing to the couple’s son [9] [12]. News outlets also flagged an implicit media and political calculation: Trump’s post reframes a personal tragedy as a contest over public sympathy and partisan moral accountability [13].
7. Why this matters — norms, escalation and precedent
Journalists and lawmakers cited in the reporting framed the post as notable for breaking norms about public decorum after a violent death and for potentially fueling partisan rancor during an active homicide probe [3] [4]. Coverage suggests the episode will be read as another example of how the president’s social-media posture can reshape immediate public narratives around high-profile events [2].
Limitations: this summary relies solely on the provided reporting; it does not include any direct archival copy of the Truth Social post beyond the quotations reproduced by outlets, nor court or LAPD filings beyond what those outlets reported [1] [6].