Did Rob Reiner face backlash or support after his remarks about the Butler attack?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
President Trump posted a mocking message saying Rob Reiner “reportedly” died “due to the anger he caused others” and invoked “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” prompting immediate, bipartisan condemnation from politicians, celebrities and media outlets; multiple outlets report Trump doubled down when pressed, saying he “wasn’t a fan” and calling Reiner “a deranged person” [1] [2] [3]. Reporting shows both widespread backlash across the political spectrum and a smaller current of right‑wing defenders or contextualizers who criticized the timing but reiterated grievances with Reiner’s politics [4] [5].
1. What Trump said and how he reacted afterward
Within hours of police discovering the deaths of Rob Reiner and his wife, the president posted that Reiner “passed away … reportedly due to the anger he caused others” and labeled him as suffering from “TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME,” a post outlets describe as politicizing a family tragedy [1] [3]. When asked about the fallout, Trump refused to retract the attack, telling reporters he “wasn’t a fan” of Reiner and calling him “a deranged person,” repeatedly doubling down on his original social‑media messaging [2] [6].
2. Immediate bipartisan backlash — who spoke out
News organizations record swift criticism from across party lines. Republican Rep. Thomas Massie wrote that, “Regardless of how you felt about Rob Reiner, this is inappropriate and disrespectful discourse about a man who was just brutally murdered,” and outlets highlight condemnation from Democrats, celebrities and former first ladies as well [3] [7] [8]. National outlets framed the post as “injecting politics into a family tragedy,” underscoring the breadth of public rebuke [3] [9].
3. Coverage tone and interpretation from major outlets
Mainstream outlets described the remarks as tasteless and indefensible in context: Reuters and The Washington Post reported the president’s suggestion lacked evidence and provoked “swift bipartisan backlash” [3] [9]. Opinion pages and analysis pieces argued the president squandered a consoling moment and illustrated a broader pattern of toxic rhetoric, with at least one major opinion column saying Reiner’s legacy will outlast “toxic talk” [10] [11].
4. Right‑wing reaction: split between reproach and justification
Reporting shows a fractured response within pro‑Trump and MAGA circles. Many initial MAGA voices expressed sympathy and compared the Reiner killings to other political violence to condemn celebrating the deaths, but some influencers and outlets defended criticizing Reiner on grounds of his long record of anti‑Trump activism [4] [5]. Axios and Forbes note that while some conservative figures pushed back at Trump’s timing, others echoed criticisms of Reiner’s politics [4] [6].
5. Legal and factual context the president ignored
Several outlets emphasized that police were investigating the deaths as homicides and had arrested Reiner’s son, and that authorities had released little about motive — facts that undercut the president’s causal claim about politics leading to the killings [9] [12]. Reporters also noted family history of the son’s struggles with addiction and homelessness, which others pointed to as relevant background; outlets stress there is no evidence linking Reiner’s politics to the killings [7] [13].
6. Public figures and Hollywood response
Multiple celebrities and public figures publicly condemned the president’s remarks as “disgusting,” “inhumane” or “too low,” with pieces compiling reactions from Maria Shriver, Whoopi Goldberg, Josh Gad and others who called for basic decency toward grieving families [8] [7] [5]. Entertainment and political outlets highlighted the emotional tenor of those responses and framed them as part of broader cultural pushback against politicizing private tragedy [10] [8].
7. What reporting does not (yet) say
Available sources do not mention any direct evidence provided by the White House tying Reiner’s death to his politics, nor do they report any official retraction by the president; they instead show Trump maintained his position when questioned [1] [2]. Available sources do not mention statements from the Reiner family accepting or rebutting the president’s claim beyond reporting on the son’s arrest and his documented struggles [12] [13].
8. Bottom line — competing narratives and why it matters
News outlets present two competing public narratives: critics say the president’s comments were an unjustified politicization of a homicide and widely condemned across parties and Hollywood [3] [8]; some conservative voices contextualized Reiner’s longtime opposition to Trump and criticized calls for deleting the post [4] [5]. Reporters uniformly note that investigators had not established motive and that public officials’ words matter in highly polarized moments, making the debate not only about etiquette but about political responsibility [9] [11].