How did major US newspapers editorialize about Rob Reiner's Israel/Palestine posts in 2024–2025?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Major U.S. newspapers’ editorials and opinion pages about Rob Reiner’s Israel/Palestine posts in 2024–2025 are not comprehensively represented in the supplied documents; available sources chiefly record news coverage of his public remarks and political activism, reporting his defense of protest rights and condemnations of Hamas, plus partisan reaction to those comments (e.g., Fox News coverage of his praise for protest protections and characterization of Hamas as “the epitome of evil”) [1]. The provided corpus contains opinion pieces and partisan commentaries (e.g., IsraellyCool and Mondoweiss) that criticized or attacked Reiner’s positions, but national newspaper editorial pages’ unified stances are not found in the supplied reporting (available sources do not mention a systematic set of major U.S. newspaper editorials on this topic).
1. What the supplied reporting says Reiner wrote and said
Reporting in these sources records several public positions Reiner took after the Oct. 7 attacks: he defended protesters’ constitutional right to demonstrate outside the DNC and praised the Harris campaign for protecting that right, while simultaneously calling Hamas “the epitome of evil” and saying anyone who condones its barbarism is evil [1]. Other outlets record his broader activism and long history of political speech, including previous criticism of Trump’s Jerusalem recognition [2] [3].
2. Major national outlets: news coverage vs. editorials
The documents supplied include news reports (Fox News, The Guardian, AP, Times of Israel) and opinion/activist sites, but they do not include a coordinated set of editorials from the major U.S. newspaper editorial pages (e.g., NYT, WP, WSJ) addressing Reiner’s Israel/Palestine posts in 2024–2025. The Guardian and Fox News pieces report his comments and the political reaction surrounding them, but do not stand in for an editorial consensus from major U.S. papers (available sources do not mention editorials by major U.S. newspapers on this precise topic) [1] [4].
3. Partisan and advocacy reactions visible in the files
Right-leaning blogs and outlets in the sample framed Reiner’s remarks antagonistically: IsraellyCool criticized him for allegedly failing to condemn pro-Hamas protesters strongly enough [5]. Mondoweiss’s 2014 piece, included here, shows long-standing activist criticism of Reiner’s public stances on Palestinian leadership and his calls to “eliminate” Hamas rather than negotiate — demonstrating that some progressive and pro-Palestinian outlets have long challenged his positions [6].
4. How outlets reported the political fallout
Coverage records broader political consequences of his remarks: reporting framed his comments as part of a wedge issue in the Democratic Party and noted public debate at events such as the DNC, with thousands of protesters in Chicago and scenes that included Hamas flags and calls for “intifada,” which outlets used to contextualize Reiner’s defense of protest rights [1]. National political reporting tied his statements into intra-party tensions and questions about public safety and antisemitism concerns outside conventions [1].
5. What’s missing from the supplied reporting
The supplied set lacks direct editorial-page responses from major U.S. newspapers (The New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, etc.) specifically assessing Reiner’s Israel/Palestine posts in 2024–2025. It also lacks systematic polling or media-analysis pieces measuring how editorial positions split along ideological lines. For claims about a newspaper consensus or detailed editorial lines, available sources do not mention those materials (available sources do not mention editorials by those papers on this topic) [1] [5] [6].
6. Competing perspectives the sources reveal
The sources show two clear, competing frames: one that defends Reiner as a defender of constitutional protest rights and criticizes Hamas unequivocally (Fox News coverage quoting Reiner directly) [1], and another that attacks him for not sufficiently distancing himself from extremist elements within protests or for advocating hardline approaches toward Palestinians (IsraellyCool and Mondoweiss critiques) [5] [6]. Both frames are present in the supplied reporting; major newspaper editorials weighing these frames are not present in the sample.
7. Takeaway and reporting limits
Based on the materials provided, mainstream news outlets documented and quoted Reiner’s posts and placed them within partisan debate, while several partisan and advocacy sites criticized or amplified particular aspects of his commentary [1] [5] [6]. The supplied sources do not include a clear, documented set of major U.S. newspaper editorial-page positions on Reiner’s Israel/Palestine posts in 2024–2025, so conclusions about an editorial consensus cannot be drawn from this corpus (available sources do not mention a systematic set of major U.S. newspaper editorials on this topic).