Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Have Shapiro or Owens reconciled publicly or altered their collaborations since the disagreement?

Checked on November 15, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Available reporting shows a public and at-times bitter split between Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens that began over disagreements about Israel and intensified through 2023–2025; there is no clear evidence in the provided sources that the two have publicly reconciled or resumed regular collaboration since that break [1] [2] [3]. More recent flare-ups tied to the fallout from Charlie Kirk’s death and leaked messages indicate continued public antagonism rather than rapprochement: Owens publicly accused Shapiro of lying about her comments, and Shapiro has publicly criticized Owens’ conduct [4] [5] [6].

1. The origin story: a public falling-out over Israel

The earliest strand in the available coverage shows a pronounced ideological split: Ben Shapiro — a prominent Daily Wire figure — publicly criticized Candace Owens’ remarks on Israel and called her commentary “disgraceful,” prompting an exchange in which Shapiro suggested Owens “by all means quit” The Daily Wire if she disagreed with its stance [1] [2]. That dispute, widely reported in late 2023, framed their relationship as fractured along foreign-policy lines, with Shapiro representing mainstream pro‑Israel conservatism and Owens aligning more with an “America First” current [2].

2. Institutional consequences: The Daily Wire and a severed tie

Reporting indicates the split had organizational ramifications: by March 2024, The Daily Wire announced it had cut ties with Owens, a move that formalized the personal and professional distance between the two sides and made routine collaboration unlikely [5] [2]. The sources document that the conflict was not merely personal heat but involved employment and platform decisions that changed the baseline for future joint appearances or projects [5].

3. Continued estrangement through 2025: new incidents, renewed rancor

Far from reconciling, the sources show the feud flared again in late 2025 amid the chaotic aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s death and the circulation of leaked texts. Owens and Shapiro publicly attacked one another over alleged claims about who was spreading conspiracy theories, with Owens calling Shapiro a liar for attributing to her an accusation about Kirk’s widow and Shapiro condemning Owens’ promotion of theories about the shooting [4] [6] [5]. Those public barbs suggest ongoing antagonism rather than reconciliation [4] [6].

4. Leaked texts and third‑party drama: fuel on the fire

The circulation of alleged leaked messages between Charlie Kirk and Owens — which some outlets say remain unverified — further complicated the landscape, portraying preexisting tensions among right‑wing influencers and implying jealousy or rivalry that involved Shapiro indirectly [7] [8]. Reporting emphasizes that the authenticity of those texts was questioned, which means they are part of the backdrop but not definitive proof of changed relationships [8].

5. What the sources do not say: no documented reconciliation or resumed collaborations

Available sources do not mention any public statement, joint appearance, podcast episode, or project since the split that would count as a reconciliation or consistent collaboration between Shapiro and Owens (not found in current reporting). The record in the provided pieces instead records sustained criticism, organizational separation, and episodic public sparring [1] [5] [4].

6. Competing interpretations and possible motives

The coverage offers competing framings: some pieces frame the rift as substantive policy disagreement — especially over Israel — and thus ideological; others treat the conflict as personality-driven factionalism in conservative media, where power, audience share and platform control matter as much as principle [2] [9]. Hidden incentives are visible: The Daily Wire’s decision to cut ties has business and brand implications; Owens’ outsized social following and alignment with alternative conservative networks create incentives on both sides to retain distinct audiences rather than reunify [2] [9].

7. Bottom line for your question: no evidence of reconciliation in these sources

Based on the reporting cited here, there is no documented public reconciliation or resumption of collaboration between Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens since their high‑profile rift; instead, later incidents through 2025 show renewed public attacks and institutional separation [1] [5] [4]. If you want confirmation beyond this sample, look for explicit joint statements, co‑hosted events, or organizational announcements that would be covered in subsequent reporting — items not present in the sources provided (not found in current reporting).

Want to dive deeper?
Have Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens publicly discussed or resolved their disagreement since it began?
Did Shapiro or Owens change their joint appearances, podcasts, or co-hosted events after the fallout?
Which media outlets or hosts have documented attempts at reconciliation between Shapiro and Owens?
Have either Shapiro or Owens addressed their disagreement on social media, and what was the public reaction?
How has the split affected their affiliations with conservative organizations, publishers, or sponsors?