Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Has Snopes ever been accused of political bias in its fact-checking?
Executive summary
Yes — Snopes has repeatedly been accused of political bias, most often by conservative outlets and critics, though reputable fact‑checking peers have praised its methods; for example, Media Bias/Fact Check says Snopes is “frequently accused of liberal bias” and cites critiques from the Daily Express and the Daily Caller [1], while FactCheck.org in 2009 concluded Snopes’s political pieces were “utterly poker‑faced” and found their work “solid and well‑documented” [2].
1. Accusations from the right: complaints and public critiques
Conservative outlets and commentators have frequently accused Snopes of liberal or anti‑conservative bias; Media Bias/Fact Check summarizes that “Snopes is frequently accused of liberal bias by some on the right” and names the Daily Express and the Daily Caller as examples of critics who say particular Snopes fact checks were wrong or biased against the right [1]. The Daily Mail and other publications have likewise raised questions about Snopes staff affiliations and the appearance of partisanship, prompting public rebuttals and commentary [3].
2. Peer reviews and defenses: professional fact‑checkers push back
Independent fact‑checking peers and outlets have reviewed Snopes and offered a different verdict: FactCheck.org sampled Snopes’s political offerings and concluded they were “utterly poker‑faced,” saying Snopes’s work was solid and well‑documented and linking to Snopes when appropriate [2]. PolitiFact also fact‑checked viral claims that sought to “bust” Snopes as a sham and found those attacks exaggerated or false [4].
3. Academic and methodological analyses: mixed signals on patterns
Academic work finds variation across fact‑checkers. A Harvard Misinformation Review study showed Snopes tended to emphasize affirming truthful claims compared with some peers, and highlighted differences in authoring patterns and rating preferences that could affect perceptions of bias [5]. Such methodological differences — what topics get checked, how often, and how ratings are framed — can produce the impression of bias even absent systematic partisan skew [6] [5].
4. Ratings from media‑bias evaluators: no consensus
Evaluative organizations reach different conclusions. Ad Fontes Media rates Snopes as neutral on bias and highly reliable [7], while Media Bias/Fact Check describes Snopes as left‑center in bias overall despite noting the site’s insistence that it applies the same standards to both sides [1]. AllSides similarly catalogs fact‑checker tendencies and warns that bias can show up in story selection and analysis, not only factual accuracy [6].
5. Snopes’s own stance and practices: transparency and rebuttal
Snopes maintains it does not choose items for coverage based on partisan lines and notes it fieldchecks items readers ask about, aiming to apply consistent standards [8]. Snopes has publicly responded to criticism over staffing and perceived slants, arguing that appearance of bias from individual staff histories does not equate to systematic editorial partisanship [3].
6. Why accusations persist: perception, coverage choices, and online politics
Accusations of bias often reflect three dynamics: political actors reacting to unfavorable rulings, differences in methodology across fact‑checkers that change what kinds of claims are spotlighted, and media ecosystems that amplify grievance narratives [6] [5]. As Forbes noted, questions about staff backgrounds and the absence of a formalized vetting protocol for fact‑checkers feed doubts among skeptics even when the outlet defends its processes [3].
7. What the evidence supports — and what it doesn’t
Available reporting shows repeated accusations of liberal bias aimed at Snopes and lists specific critics and critiques [1] [3], while independent reviewers like FactCheck.org and Ad Fontes Media have found Snopes’s work solid or neutral in bias [2] [7]. Available sources do not mention a definitive, systematic study proving a consistent partisan skew across Snopes’s entire output; academic analysis notes methodological differences that can influence perception but does not universally label Snopes partisan [5].
8. How readers should interpret competing claims
Readers should weigh both patterns of criticism (who is criticizing and why) and independent assessments of methodology and accuracy: some evaluators and peer fact‑checkers find Snopes reliable and nonpartisan in practice [2] [7], while others and specific critics see liberal leaning based on coverage choices or disputed rulings [1] [3]. Comparing multiple fact‑checkers and seeing how different organizations rate the same claim is a practical way to spot substantive disagreements versus politically motivated attacks [6].
Limitations: this summary relies only on the supplied sources and notes differences among critics, peer reviewers, academics, and Snopes itself; a comprehensive, up‑to‑date audit of all Snopes articles is not included in the provided reporting (not found in current reporting).