Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Snopes
1. Summary of the results
Snopes is a fact-checking website established in 1994 [1] [2] [3] that employs a rigorous methodology including deep research, transparency, and expert consultation to verify claims and debunk misinformation [1]. The platform has received high credibility ratings, including a 100/100 score from NewsGuard [4], and complies with International Fact Checking Network standards [4].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Several important contextual elements need to be considered:
- While Snopes has a left-center bias rating, it maintains high factual reporting standards, with FactCheck.org finding them free from bias in political fact-checks, verifying facts 98% of the time [2].
- The organization maintains an independent status and operates with a transparent funding model [3].
- The perception of bias often depends on the reader's political stance [5].
- The higher volume of fact-checks on conservative-targeted misinformation may contribute to perceptions of bias, rather than actual bias in methodology [5].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
Several stakeholders have different interests in how Snopes is perceived:
- Conservative groups often criticize Snopes for alleged liberal bias [1], which could benefit their narrative of mainstream media bias.
- Snopes founder David Mikkelson argues that their fact-checks primarily focus on debunking false claims rather than targeting specific political perspectives [5].
- Independent fact-checking organizations like FactCheck.org and NewsGuard have verified Snopes' credibility [2] [4], supporting the platform's reputation.
- Readers are advised to cross-check information despite Snopes' reliable reputation [3], highlighting the importance of multiple source verification in fact-checking.