Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Did Donald Trump have inappropriate relationships with his daughter
Executive summary
Public reporting documents a long record of Donald Trump making sexually suggestive comments about his daughter Ivanka — including public quips such as “if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be dating her” and multiple Howard Stern/The View interviews where he praised her body [1] [2]. Former White House aides quoted in a 2023 book by Miles Taylor say Trump made lewd remarks about Ivanka’s breasts, backside and “what it might be like to have sex with her,” prompting a rebuke from then–Chief of Staff John Kelly [3] [4].
1. Pattern of public comments: repeated, documented, and often crude
Reporting across outlets has compiled decades of Trump’s public remarks about Ivanka — from radio interviews in the 2000s to television appearances — where he described her as “voluptuous,” said “perhaps I’d be dating her,” and allowed callers or hosts to discuss her physique [1] [2] [5]. News outlets such as The Independent, CNN and others have archived multiple instances and audio/video clips showing Trump normalizing crude talk about his daughter [1] [2] [5].
2. Allegations from aides about workplace comments inside the White House
In 2023 Miles Taylor, a former Department of Homeland Security official, wrote that several aides recalled Trump making lewd comments about Ivanka while in the West Wing, including explicit talk about her breasts, backside and hypothetical sex; those accounts say John Kelly had to remind Trump that Ivanka was his daughter [3] [4]. Newsweek and The Seattle Times summarized Taylor’s book reporting these specific alleged remarks by aides [4] [3].
3. Visual material and social-media outrage: photos, viral posts, and fact checks
Old photographs and social posts showing Trump with Ivanka have periodically circulated online and provoked accusations of “creepy” behavior; some viral claims overstated context or misrepresented images. Reuters and other fact-checkers reviewed widely shared photos and concluded that some images were authentic but being framed as evidence of inappropriate contact when they simply showed father-daughter poses at events [6]. Other outlets have documented the viral lifecycle of such images and accompanying reactions [7] [8].
4. Differentiating remarks from proven misconduct — what sources do and do not show
Available reporting catalogs numerous suggestive remarks and contemporaneous witness recollections [1] [2] [4]. However, the sources provided do not offer independent, legal findings that Trump engaged in sexual conduct with his daughter; they present documented statements and witness allegations about lewd comments and public behavior rather than judicial determinations of sexual wrongdoing toward Ivanka [3] [4]. If you are looking for criminal findings or civil rulings specifically about conduct with his daughter, available sources do not mention such outcomes.
5. How journalists and commentators frame the evidence and motive
Opinion pieces and columnists treat these statements differently: some interpret the pattern as evidence of a troubling, sexualized public persona toward his daughter and women generally [9] [5], while fact-checkers emphasize context and counter false visual claims [6] [8]. Reporters note potential agendas — ex-staff authors like Miles Taylor are critics of Trump and frame anecdotes to illustrate broader critiques of the White House culture, which readers should weigh alongside contemporaneous sourcing [4] [3].
6. What this means for assessing “inappropriate relationships”
If by “inappropriate relationships” one means repeated lewd comments, sexualizing language and behavior that made aides uncomfortable, the journalism record provides multiple examples and witness accounts documenting that pattern [1] [4] [3]. If the phrase implies sexual contact or criminal acts between father and daughter, the sources do not present evidence or legal findings to that effect — they focus on remarks, photos, and staff recollections rather than adjudicated sexual misconduct involving Ivanka [6] [4].
7. Takeaway for readers seeking clarity
There is a consistent, well-documented trail of public and private remarks that many outlets and former aides describe as lewd and “creepy” toward Ivanka [1] [4] [9]. At the same time, reputable fact-checking reporting cautions against conflating out-of-context photos or viral claims with proof of sexual contact and stresses verifying image provenance and context [6] [8]. Readers should separate documented quotes and staff testimony from stronger legal or criminal claims — both are reported, but only the former is detailed in the provided sources [3] [4].