Are there documented flight logs linking Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein's Little St. James?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Publicly available flight logs show Donald Trump listed as a passenger on Jeffrey Epstein’s planes multiple times in the 1990s and 2000s; different outlets report “seven” to “at least eight” flights in released logs [1][2][3]. Available reporting also says there is no documented evidence in the released flight manifests or files that Trump ever visited Epstein’s Little St. James island [4][5].
1. Flight logs place Trump on Epstein’s aircraft — how many times?
Multiple declassification releases and news reports cite Trump’s name appearing repeatedly in Epstein’s plane manifests. The Department of Justice released flight logs and related materials in 2025 that included passenger lists with Trump’s name [1]. News outlets summarize the counts slightly differently: People and some contemporaneous reporting reference seven appearances in the released Phase 1 files [6][7], Forbes, BBC and others note several flights in the 1990s and report counts of four to eight flights depending on which logs and compilations are tallied [8][9][2]. These discrepancies reflect which batches of documents and what time windows each outlet examined [2][3].
2. The logs do not equal guilt — how sources frame the meaning
The outlets that published the logs emphasize that appearing on a manifest is not proof of criminal conduct. The People report and other summaries explicitly state that names on flight logs “are not an indication of wrongdoing” and could reflect legitimate social, business or political travel [6]. Cleveland.com notes that while Trump appears in the Phase 1 flight logs seven times, there is “no evidence” presented in those releases that he engaged in illegal activity with Epstein [7]. Reporting consistently separates presence on flights from any proven criminal involvement.
3. Do the logs show travel to Little St. James?
Examination across fact-checks and news stories finds no documented flight records or other released material that confirms Trump ever went to Epstein’s Little St. James island. PolitiFact and multiple news outlets concluded they “did not find evidence” or “no records confirm a visit” to the private island [4][10]. Reuters’ reporting of Trump’s comments also cites that none of the logged trips involving Trump were to Epstein’s private island [5].
4. Why the counts and interpretations differ in reporting
Differences in the number of flights attributed to Trump stem from which log batches and related civil or trial documents each outlet used. Some outlets rely on the DOJ’s February 2025 “Phase 1” declassification package; others use compilations unearthed in civil suits or by news organizations in mid‑2025 that combined additional manifests and pilot notes [1][2]. Journalists and fact‑checkers caution that manifests use initials, nicknames and shorthand that can complicate definitive identification of individuals without corroborating evidence [2].
5. Political context and competing narratives
The release of the Epstein files became politicized: Congress passed a law requiring DOJ release and the Trump administration produced batches of material while also facing criticism about possible withholding of files [11][12]. Trump and allies have framed the material as either exculpatory or politically weaponized; critics argue transparency remains incomplete. Reporting shows Democrats on House committees have released photos from Epstein’s estate to press scrutiny and push the DOJ to release files by statutory deadlines [13][14].
6. Limits of current reporting — what the sources do not say
Available sources document Trump’s appearances on flight manifests and repeatedly state there is no recorded evidence that he visited Little St. James [1][4]. Sources do not provide conclusive contemporaneous corroboration (such as boarding passes, logs explicitly naming island‑bound flights for Trump, or witness testimony) that place him on Epstein’s island; therefore “no documented evidence” remains the accurate statement based on current releases [4][5]. Sources also do not resolve every discrepancy in flight counts; that variation is described but not fully reconciled in public reporting [2][3].
Conclusion — reporting consensus and unresolved questions: The declassified and court‑released flight logs include Donald Trump’s name multiple times, but major news outlets and fact‑checks say those logs do not show he visited Little St. James and do not by themselves indicate criminal conduct [1][4][7]. Discrepancies in the exact number of flights reflect which documents were counted; journalists and fact‑checkers continue to urge caution in equating presence on manifests with wrongdoing absent corroborating evidence [2][6].