What are Trump's social media posts on truth social

1. A torrent of posts — the scale and timing

News organizations that tracked the activity reported Trump posted at an exceptional clip: Axios counted 158 posts between about 9:00 p.m. and midnight (nearly one a minute), while multiple outlets later reported a 160‑post total across a roughly five‑hour span — figures now cited across reporting ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

2. What he posted — themes and recurring targets

The late‑night barrage broadly followed patterns already noted in his Truth Social output: repeated attacks on political rivals (Sen. Mark Kelly and others), reposts of flattering clips and commentary praising him, and circulation of conspiracy‑tinged material such as an Alex Jones video alleging Michelle Obama used Biden’s autopen — material that many outlets flagged as dubious or sourced to InfoWars ^{[2] [4] [6]}.

3. Sourcing and verification problems in the stream

Several outlets documented that the spree included posts resharing content from far‑right commentators and fringe sites; The New Republic and Raw Story said some items resembled “fake news” or debunked claims, while Snopes keeps a running collection of false or fabricated Truth Social posts attributed to Trump — an indication verification organizations are actively cataloguing problematic items ^{[7] [8] [6]}.

4. Tone and optics — critics, late‑night comics and lawmakers weigh in

Commentators and late‑night hosts framed the episode as evidence of an unrelenting and sometimes incoherent social‑media habit; the Late Night roundup singled out the sheer volume and scattered subject matter, while lawmakers and pundits criticized specific posts as “vile” or “petty” in subsequent incidents ^{[3] [9]}.

5. Deletions, typos and immediate corrections

Reporting captured that some posts were error‑ridden and at least one message was deleted and reposted in corrected form — a dynamic covered by The Daily Beast that illustrates the platform’s near‑real‑time editing and the permanency of screenshots once content spreads ^[10].

6. Disagreements in the record: counts, labels and intent

Outlets differ slightly on the exact post count (158 vs. 160) and on tone labels — some call the spree “unhinged” or “brainrot,” while others simply chronicle subject matter without those adjectives. Those disparities reflect editorial judgments about tone and intent and signal readers should review primary posts where possible ^{[1] [7] [5]}.

7. What this means for readers and voters

The pattern — attack, self‑praise, amplification of fringe claims — tightens the need for independent verification of any sensational items shared on Truth Social; fact‑checking shops and mainstream outlets are already tracking and debunking specific claims ^{[8] [7]}. Available sources do not mention a complete archive of every single post from the spree in one place; readers seeking the primary texts must consult Truth Social directly and cross‑check reputable fact‑checks ^{[11] [12]}.

8. Motives and hidden agendas to consider

Several outlets frame the spree as strategic amplification — reinforcing base narratives, pushing culture‑war stories into the news cycle and rallying supporters with repetitive praise — while critics argue it also serves to distract from other news or to elevate fringe claims into mainstream attention ^{[2] [4]}. Each outlet’s political framing matters: conservative‑leaning and left‑leaning outlets emphasize different dangers in the same behavior.

Limitations: reporting relies on media reconstructions and platform screenshots; counts and exact post text vary between outlets, and a single, complete, journalist‑verified archive of every truth from that night is not provided in the sources above ^{[1] [2]}. If you want, I can compile a list of the most‑reported individual posts (with sources) from that spree next.