Which UK police forces made the most arrests for social media posts in 2024 and are there regional patterns?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Data published by national outlets and individual forces show thousands of UK arrests for offensive online communications in 2023–24 and wide variation across forces: The Daily Mail’s compilation (based on FOIs) reported at least 9,700 arrests across 39 forces in 2024 and named Cumbria (217 arrests) and Gwent among the highest; other reporting and FOI disclosures single out large metropolitan forces — Metropolitan, West Yorkshire and Thames Valley — as high-volume arresting forces in previous years (Metropolitan: 1,709 in 2023) [1] [2] [3]. Independent academic and parliamentary sources place the total national arrest figure for wider summer-2024 disorder-related policing at roughly 1,280–1,590 for the riots period specifically, showing distinct event-driven surges [4] [5].
1. What public data exists and how reliable is it?
Media outlets have assembled force-level totals from Freedom of Information (FOI) responses; the Daily Mail’s dataset covering 39 of 45 forces produced the 9,700-plus 2024 figure and per-force rates such as Cumbria’s 217 arrests [1] [6]. Independent FOIs from individual forces demonstrate variability in record-keeping and searchability: West Yorkshire Police disclosed 24,703 arrests under harassment/malicious communications offences in a period but cautioned only 1,533 records explicitly referenced platform keywords and many entries require manual review to confirm a social-media link [3]. That uneven granularity limits direct comparisons between forces [3].
2. Which forces register the most arrests and why numbers diverge
Large urban forces historically record the greatest absolute numbers: The Times’ earlier data showed Metropolitan Police, West Yorkshire and Thames Valley with the highest tallies in 2023 (Metropolitan 1,709) — a pattern the Free Speech Union cited to show volume correlates with population and caseload [2]. The Daily Mail’s 2024 FOI roll-up instead highlights high per-capita rates in smaller forces (Cumbria highest rate per 100,000) and notes some forces did not respond, so totals are a lower bound [6] [1]. Divergence arises from population size, how forces tag incidents in records, whether FOI requests capture platform mentions, and local enforcement priorities [3] [6].
3. Regional patterns and event-driven surges
Available reporting shows both regional clustering and short-term spikes tied to specific events. The 2024 summer protests and riots produced concentrated arrests for social-media activity connected to disorder in multiple northern and metropolitan areas: academic research lists arrests linked to riot locations including Metropolitan, Merseyside, Greater Manchester, Cleveland and Humberside, with dozens attributed to those forces during the early August unrest (e.g., Met 121; Merseyside 64; Cleveland 63) [5]. Separately, county forces such as Cumbria and Gwent reported high per-capita arrest rates in the Daily Mail compilation, suggesting rural/less-populated regions can register high rates when local policing and FOI methodology amplify counts [6] [1].
4. Legal context and prosecutorial guidance
Arrests for online posts are typically recorded under offences such as Section 127 of the Communications Act (misuse of public electronic communications), harassment, racially or religiously aggravated harassment and malicious communications; prosecutorial guidance from the Crown Prosecution Service pushes for charges only in “extreme circumstances,” creating a gap between arrests and prosecutions or convictions [7] [2]. Analysts and fact-checkers note many arrests do not lead to charges or long sentences — 137 immediate imprisonments cited for one category in 2024 — which highlights a funnel where many detentions do not become convictions [8].
5. Conflicting interpretations and hidden agendas
Sources frame the numbers through different lenses. Civil liberties groups, Free Speech Union commentary and some media outlets argue the figures show over‑zealous policing of speech and chilling effects [2] [1]. National tabloid presentations stress a “police state” narrative and emphasize shock-value aggregates [6] [1]. Academic work and police FOIs emphasise methodological limits — inconsistent tagging, the need for manual reviews, and event-driven surges — suggesting data quality, not solely policy aggression, explains variation [3] [5].
6. What we cannot conclude from current reporting
Available sources do not provide a definitive, fully comparable per-force ranking for all 45 UK police forces in 2024 because some forces did not respond to FOIs and because record-keeping and keyword-search methodologies vary; therefore a single, authoritative list of “most arrests” across 2024 is not present in current reporting [1] [3]. Nor do the sources give a uniform breakdown showing what proportion of each force’s arrests were event-related versus routine online offences beyond case studies and partial FOI disclosures [3] [5].
7. Bottom line for readers
Multiple datasets show thousands of arrests linked to online communications in recent years, with large metropolitan forces producing high absolute counts and some smaller forces showing high per-capita rates; methodological inconsistencies and partial FOI coverage mean any headline ranking should be treated cautiously [1] [2] [3]. For a definitive, comparable national picture, a standardized public dataset from all forces using common search criteria is required — that dataset is not available in the cited reporting [3] [1].