Are there police or coroner reports confirming Virginia Giuffre's cause of death?

1. What the main public claims assert — a concise inventory that matters

Public accounts converge on a central claim: the Giuffre family announced that Virginia died by suicide in late April 2025, and multiple obituaries and news pieces relay that family statement and background about her history as a survivor of sexual abuse and trafficking. Reporters also highlight contemporaneous social-media posts and family quotes that frame chronic pain and psychological trauma as contributing factors to her death. At the same time, commentary from her attorney and some relatives introduced questions about whether all investigative avenues have been exhausted, generating follow-up coverage that underscores the lack of a completed coroner’s finding in the record supplied ^{[4] [5] [2]}.

2. What law enforcement publicly reported — early indicators, not final findings

Western Australia Police figures and reporting from late April and early May 2025 described the death as not being treated as suspicious and noted that Major Crime detectives had been involved in the preliminary inquiry. Multiple pieces emphasize that police investigations hand over evidence to coroners and that only limited information is typically released to non-family members during active inquiries. These police characterizations are consistent across the supplied analyses, but they are framed as initial investigative positions rather than the definitive medical-legal cause of death ^{[2] [3] [6]}.

3. The coroner’s role and the timing gap that fuels uncertainty

Every source acknowledges that the coroner will formally determine the cause of death, and several reports note that toxicology and full coroner findings can take months or even up to two years to complete and publish. Journalistic pieces point out that family statements can convey an immediate narrative — in this case, suicide — but official confirmation rests with coroner determinations and toxicology results, which were not present in the supplied items. That procedural lag explains why legal representatives, family members, and media outlets can appear to be speaking past one another while the coroner’s office compiles evidence ^{[7] [3]}.

4. Conflicting statements from relatives and legal representatives — what they actually said

The supplied reporting shows variation among close sources: Giuffre’s family publicly stated she died by suicide and connected the death to lifelong trauma and chronic physical problems, while her father and other relatives expressed doubts about the circumstances. Her attorney, Karrie Louden, initially cast doubt on some media narratives but later clarified she did not believe the death was suspicious and said she was not pressing for a separate investigation. These differences are important because they reflect both grief-driven concern and the limited information available before an official coroner’s report ^{[4] [2] [6]}.

5. The factual bottom line and what remains to be established

The factual record in the supplied analyses is that family statements and contemporaneous news reports attribute Virginia Giuffre’s death to suicide and that police described the death as not suspicious, but no coroner’s report or released toxicology results confirming cause of death are present in the materials provided. The most consequential remaining facts are the coroner’s formal finding and laboratory toxicology, which will either corroborate the family’s statement or provide further nuance; until those records are published, official confirmation is absent from the public record cited here ^{[1] [2] [7]}.