Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: The Washington Post Has Officially Lost 90 Percent of Its Readership

Checked on January 14, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The claim about a 90% readership loss requires important context and nuance. Multiple sources confirm a significant decline in readership, though the exact numbers vary by metric:

  • Daily site visitors dropped from 22.5 million (January 2021) to 2.5-3 million (summer 2023), representing an ~87% decline [1] [1]
  • Digital visitors decreased from 114 million (November 2020) to 54 million (November 2023) [1] [1]
  • The Post reportedly lost $100 million in 2024 due to weak subscription and ad revenue [1] [1]

However, there are conflicting reports, as one source indicates growth in digital readership as of December 2022, with a 10% month-over-month increase in page views and 7% year-over-year growth in unique visits [2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial contextual factors are missing from the original statement:

  • The decline appears to be tied to specific events and decisions:

Cancellations following a Kamala Harris endorsement decision [1]

Loss of top talent to competitor publications [1]

Changes in internal leadership [1]

Potential shifts in editorial direction under Jeff Bezos's ownership [1]

  • The Post is actively working on recovery strategies:

Exploring AI and news aggregation solutions [1]

Planning workforce reductions to address financial losses [1]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement oversimplifies a complex situation:

  • It presents the decline as a simple percentage without acknowledging different metrics or timeframes
  • It fails to mention that different measurement methods show different results
  • The term "officially" is misleading as these numbers come from various sources and measurements

Who benefits from this narrative:

  • Competing news organizations benefit from portraying the Post's decline
  • Political opponents of the Washington Post's editorial stance
  • Critics of Jeff Bezos's ownership of the publication
  • Alternative media platforms seeking to position themselves as more reliable news sources

The situation appears to be more complex than a simple 90% decline, though significant readership losses are confirmed by multiple sources.

Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?