Were recent layoffs at CBS racially targeted or applied across all demographics?

Checked on December 15, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

CBS and parent Paramount carried out rounds of layoffs in late October 2025 that affected roughly 100 CBS News staffers as part of a broader corporate reduction of about 1,000 employees in the first wave [1]. Multiple news reports and staff accounts say cuts hit specific units — notably the Race & Culture unit and on-air roles where all eight on-air personalities let go were women — and social-media posts by a former producer allege that producers of color were disproportionately affected [2] [3] [4].

1. What the public record shows about who was cut

Paramount’s October cuts were described as a broad cost-saving move that impacted CBS News among other divisions; outlets reported "close to 100" CBS News staffers were affected and that the Race & Culture unit was eliminated [2] [5]. The Los Angeles Times and Deadline both report the cuts were spread through newsrooms and production units rather than limited to a single department [1] [2].

2. Specific patterns flagged by reporters and insiders

Reporting highlights a pattern that fed concern: all eight on-air personalities fired in the round were women, and some accounts say half of those were people of color [3] [4]. Trade and media outlets singled out the shuttering of the Race & Culture unit — a unit created in 2020 — as a notable, targeted loss that affects coverage and staffing of race-related reporting [2].

3. First‑person allegations of racial targeting

A former CBS associate producer, Trey Sherman, posted a viral TikTok alleging that “every producer from my team who was laid off is a person of color,” while white colleagues were reassigned — an allegation that has driven much of the controversy [4] [6]. Local and campus outlets reported Sherman’s assertions and noted CBS had not publicly released demographic breakdowns to confirm or deny the claim [6].

4. Corporate framing and scale of the cuts

Paramount framed the layoffs as part of a wider plan to trim more than $2 billion in expenses after a corporate merger, and early reporting emphasizes the reductions were company‑wide, affecting multiple brands and production units beyond CBS News [7] [1]. Newsroom sources say some cuts were planned before Bari Weiss’s appointment as editor‑in‑chief, though that change in leadership is cited by some observers as relevant context [5] [3].

5. What the news outlets and union actions show about process

Deadline noted that the WGA East and West were engaged to ensure collective bargaining agreements and labor law compliance for impacted members, indicating formal labor channels were in play for some affected staff [2]. That procedural attention does not answer who was disproportionately affected demographically; it only signals legal and contractual processes were invoked.

6. Gaps in available evidence and company silence

CBS has not publicly released the demographic breakdown of the layoffs, and reporters consistently note the absence of clarifying data from the company — a key limitation in determining whether cuts were racially targeted versus broadly applied [6] [5]. Available sources do not mention internal, company‑published statistics that would validate or refute Sherman’s claims.

7. Competing explanations in the reporting

Mainstream coverage frames the layoffs as part of large corporate cost‑cutting tied to the Paramount‑Skydance merger and David Ellison’s expense plan [7] [1]. Critics and affected employees frame the same events as evidence that diversity commitments may be hollow when cost decisions are made, pointing to the elimination of the Race & Culture unit and the demographic patterns of those let go [2] [4].

8. What to watch next and how to evaluate new information

The most decisive evidence would be an internal or independent demographic audit of layoffs or a formal company statement detailing the composition of cuts; currently, reporting shows neither has been published [6] [5]. Watch for union filings, EEOC complaints, or an internal memo from Paramount/CBS that provides names and roles with demographic context — those would materially change the public record.

Summary judgment: reporting documents both company‑wide cost‑cutting that affected CBS News and credible first‑person claims that people of color and women were disproportionately impacted; however, the company has not released demographic data that would definitively establish racial targeting [1] [4] [3]. Available sources do not mention any official, public demographic breakdown that settles the dispute one way or the other [6].

Want to dive deeper?
What was the racial and demographic breakdown of employees affected by the recent CBS layoffs?
Did CBS provide demographic data or an independent audit about who was furloughed or let go?
Have any former CBS employees filed discrimination or wrongful-termination claims related to the layoffs?
How do CBS’s layoffs compare to diversity and inclusion goals or past hiring practices?
What statements have unions, employee resource groups, or civil-rights organizations made about CBS’s layoffs?