What exactly did candace owens say about charlie kirk that sparked controversy?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Candace Owens ignited controversy by airing private texts and making a series of public allegations about the late Charlie Kirk — including that he told people he feared he would be murdered the day before he was killed, that he was “in love” with another woman before marrying Erika Kirk, and that Turning Point USA figures may have known or been involved — claims that critics call conspiracy-mongering and that Kirk’s widow and allies have publicly rejected [1] [2] [3] [4]. Media outlets and former associates say Owens’ assertions have provoked harassment of Kirk’s friends, prompted public rebukes, and intensified a factional split within right‑wing circles [5] [6] [7].
1. What Owens actually said that sparked the backlash
On multiple episodes of her show and across social platforms, Owens aired private text messages and asserted that Charlie Kirk had warned people — including staff and a donor — that “they are going to kill me tomorrow,” and she challenged Turning Point USA and Erika Kirk about who knew what and when [2] [8]. Separately, Owens suggested Kirk had been “in love” with another woman before marrying Erika, sharing texts about outfit advice and implying a romantic prehistory that critics called inappropriate to publicize [1] [3].
2. How those statements moved from gossip to conspiracy allegations
Owens did not stop at personal texts. She layered broader theories onto those claims: accusing or insinuating that TPUSA insiders, security personnel, or even foreign actors could be implicated, and naming or suggesting that Charlie’s security provider and other figures had suspicious connections or prior warnings about his death [9] [2]. Her coverage included claims traced to unnamed “sources” inside TPUSA and speculation about motive and potential cover-ups [2] [9].
3. Immediate reactions from the Kirk family and allies
Erika Kirk, now CEO of Turning Point USA, publicly asked people to stop spreading unfounded claims and explicitly pushed back against Owens’ versions of events, saying she had Charlie’s phone and found no such messages — a direct rebuttal to Owens’ narrative [4] [8]. Charlie Kirk’s longtime producer Blake Neff and other former colleagues criticized Owens for attacking Kirk’s friends and provoking harassment of people close to him [5].
4. Media and conservative establishment responses
Mainstream and right‑leaning outlets described Owens’ commentary as conspiracy‑driven and damaging to the broader movement. Commentators warned her theories were fueling harassment and could harm political objectives, while others defended her as raising legitimate questions; this split has deepened tensions within conservative media [6] [5]. Columnists and outlets said Owens’ episode views and platform mean her claims spread widely, magnifying both impact and backlash [5] [10].
5. Which parts are documented and which are disputed
Reports document that Owens shared private texts and publicly alleged Kirk feared for his life and may have predicted his death [1] [2]. Erika Kirk and TPUSA figures have directly disputed key elements — Erika saying she had Kirk’s phone and found no such message [4] [8]. Available sources do not mention any definitive official evidence proving Owens’ broader allegations about TPUSA involvement or foreign actors; those remain allegations in Owens’ commentary [2] [9].
6. Why the story has become so combustible
The controversy mixes grief, politics, celebrity conservative media, and unanswered questions about an assassination. Owens’ past practice of public provocation and conspiracy speculation has an established audience, increasing reach and intensity; critics argue that equals real‑world harassment of private individuals and organizational damage [5] [6]. Supporters say she is asking hard questions about transparency; detractors say she is baselessly smearing people and weaponizing grief for clicks [5] [6].
7. Takeaway and limits of current reporting
Current reporting shows a clear pattern: Owens publicly aired texts and repeated allegations about Kirk’s warnings and personal life, prompting rebuttals from Erika Kirk and condemnation from some of Kirk’s associates [1] [4] [5]. Sources document public disagreement and the spread of conspiracy claims but do not provide independent verification of Owens’ most explosive allegations — e.g., TPUSA complicity or foreign involvement — which remain unproven in the cited coverage [2] [9]. Critics warn the claims have tangible consequences for grieving people and for political unity on the right [6] [5].