What exactly did Rob Reiner say about the Butler assassination attempt?

Checked on December 16, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

President Donald Trump published a social-media post that tied Rob Reiner’s outspoken criticism of Trump to Reiner’s killing, saying Reiner had “Trump derangement syndrome” and suggesting his politics were responsible for the director’s death [1]. That remark drew swift bipartisan condemnation and widespread media coverage as police investigated the double-homicide and arrested Reiner’s son, Nick, on suspicion of murder [2] [3].

1. What Trump actually posted — the statement and its framing

Trump’s post mocked Rob Reiner and suggested, without evidence, that Reiner’s anti-Trump views caused or were connected to his death; news organizations summarized the message as blaming Reiner’s politics for the killing and calling him a driver of “Trump derangement syndrome” [1]. Multiple outlets reported the post as an explicit political attack delivered at a time when authorities were still investigating the Reiners’ deaths [4] [5].

2. Immediate reaction — bipartisan backlash and public condemnation

Media and political figures quickly criticized the president’s message. Reuters and other outlets described the response as “swift and bipartisan,” with commentators calling it inappropriate to inject politics into a family’s tragedy [1]. Republican lawmakers also criticized the post as lacking empathy and decency, and urged more measured presidential rhetoric [5].

3. How news outlets contextualized the claim

News organizations framed Trump’s claim as unsubstantiated: reporters emphasized there was no public evidence linking Reiner’s political activities to the deaths, and that investigators had arrested Rob Reiner’s son, Nick, and were treating the case as a homicide [2] [3]. Several outlets highlighted that authorities had released limited information about motive as they prepared to hand the case to the Los Angeles County District Attorney [2].

4. What investigators reported about the deaths

Police described the deaths of Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele Singer Reiner, as homicides; reporting noted the couple suffered stab wounds and that their younger son, Nick Reiner, was arrested and booked on suspicion of murder and held pending potential charges [6] [3]. Reuters and AP coverage emphasized that the investigation and any legal charges would be determined by prosecutors following the police inquiry [1] [7].

5. Media focus on timing and sensitivity

Multiple outlets — including CNN, The Washington Post and CNBC — drew attention to the timing and tone of the president’s post, noting many found it insensitive given the family’s loss and the ongoing investigation; some commentators explicitly contrasted the post with expectations of presidential restraint during a grieving moment [2] [4] [5].

6. Competing narratives in partisan and fringe outlets

Beyond mainstream outlets, partisan and fringe sites amplified different frames: some conservative outlets and social posts attempted to link Reiner’s political rhetoric to other violent incidents or to criticize Hollywood’s political activism, while other outlets condemned that linkage as irresponsible given the lack of evidence [8] [9] [10]. Reuters and NPR-style reporting treated the president’s claim as an unproven assertion and focused on official investigative facts [1].

7. What the reporting does not say

Available sources do not present any official evidence tying Rob Reiner’s political views to his death; law enforcement had not released a motive and reported facts centered on the arrests and physical evidence at the scene [2] [3]. There is no reporting in the provided sources showing prosecutors or investigators endorsing the president’s suggestion that Reiner’s politics led to the killings [1].

8. Why the distinction matters — politics versus criminal investigation

Journalists and officials singled out the difference between political commentary and criminal fact-finding: mainstream reports stressed that political actors offering causal attributions while investigations are active can shape public perceptions and inflame partisan divisions without new evidence [4] [5]. Several news pieces characterized the president’s post as inserting partisan narrative into a developing homicide probe [1].

9. Bottom line

President Trump publicly blamed Rob Reiner’s criticism of him for the director’s death in a social-media post that called Reiner “very bad for our country” and referred to “Trump derangement syndrome,” prompting immediate bipartisan condemnation; independent reporting in mainstream outlets treated that claim as unsubstantiated while focusing on police statements that the case was being investigated as a homicide and that Reiner’s son was in custody on suspicion of murder [1] [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What did Rob Reiner originally claim about the Butler assassination attempt and when did he say it?
Has Rob Reiner issued a correction or apology regarding his comments on the Butler assassination attempt?
Who is Butler in the context of the alleged assassination attempt and what is the confirmed timeline of events?
How have media outlets and fact-checkers evaluated Rob Reiner’s statements about the Butler assassination attempt?
Did any official investigations or law enforcement statements corroborate or refute Rob Reiner’s remarks on the Butler assassination attempt?