What is Factually.co and its mission?

Are you looking for more information regarding Factually? Check out our FAQ!

Still have questions? Reach out!

Checked on February 4, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.
Searched for:
"Factually.co mission and purpose"
Found 1 sources

Executive summary

Factually.co — presented in its public materials as Factually Health — is an AI-driven health information platform that says its mission is to enable health-focused companies and organizations to share factual health information with patients, customers and communities, with the explicit goal of combating health misinformation [1]. The company frames this purpose as both a public-good and a commercial value proposition: reducing harm from bad information while helping organizations communicate reliably with their audiences using modern AI tools [1].

1. What Factually.co says it is: an AI-driven health information service

Factually Health describes itself as a team of experienced leaders in health, AI and business who have built a platform to deliver trusted, factual health information globally, leveraging modern AI technology to face challenges around misinformation [1]. The site emphasizes that the platform is designed for use by health-focused companies and organizations — hospitals, clinics, insurers or health brands — as a way to disseminate verified health content to staff, patients and customers rather than acting as a direct-to-consumer media outlet [1].

2. The mission statement up close: “enable … to share factual health information”

Repeated verbatim across the company’s pages is the mission: to enable health-focused companies and organizations to share factual health information with their patients, customers and communities, summarized internally as “Factually Health has one mission - to empower the world with factual health information” [1]. That language frames misinformation not only as a public-health hazard but as a business risk — “Bad info is bad for people, and it’s bad for businesses and organizations” — which positions Factually’s product as both an ethical intervention and a reputational tool for clients [1].

3. Team credentials and implied credibility claims

The company materials highlight a leadership team with "over 130 years of combined expertise in Health, AI and Business," and reference serial entrepreneurs among the founders with previous company exits, presenting experience as a credibility anchor for its health information mission [1]. Those résumé claims are used to support the platform’s trustworthiness and to reassure prospective partners that the product blends domain knowledge with technical capability [1]. The reporting available does not independently verify those biographical details, so external confirmation would be required to substantiate individual resumes beyond the company’s own assertions [1].

4. How Factually frames its technology and purpose — commercial product with civic rhetoric

Factually frames its use of AI as a necessary modern response to the rapid spread of misinformation, positioning the platform as a technological fix for an informational problem that affects public health and organizational outcomes alike [1]. That dual framing — public service plus B2B service — signals an implicit commercial agenda: organizations pay to reduce misinformation risk to their stakeholders while benefiting from improved communication, a standard SaaS value proposition applied to health content [1]. The documentation provided does not detail pricing, governance, content-sourcing standards, or independent third-party validation of accuracy, so readers must treat the civic rhetoric as a stated goal rather than independently confirmed impact [1].

5. Limits of the available reporting and open questions

The source material is promotional and outlines mission, team experience and product intent, but it does not disclose empirical measures of impact, regulatory compliance details, editorial governance, data-privacy practices, or independent assessments of accuracy — all important for judging whether an AI-driven health platform truly reduces misinformation in practice [1]. Alternative viewpoints — such as independent researchers, patient advocates or health regulators — are not present in the cited material, leaving open critical questions about how Factually sources and vets content, how it handles contested medical claims, and how it mitigates algorithmic bias in health guidance [1].

6. Bottom line: a mission statement with commercial contours and unanswered verification needs

Factually Health presents itself unequivocally as an AI-powered platform whose mission is to empower organizations to deliver factual health information and to combat misinformation, using team experience and modern AI as selling points [1]. That mission is clear in the company’s own words, but independent validation of outcomes, transparency about methods, and external scrutiny are not provided in the available company materials and remain necessary to move from mission statement to proven public-good impact [1].

Want to dive deeper?
How do AI-driven health information platforms source and verify clinical content?
What independent evaluations exist of Factually Health's accuracy and real-world impact?
How do health organizations decide between in-house content teams and third-party AI platforms for patient communications?