Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Truth social
Executive summary
Truth Social is a social-media app founded by Donald Trump in 2022 that remains a small but politically visible platform: Britannica summarizes its founding purpose and recent coverage [1]. Financial filings and industry data show the parent company reported steep losses (a $54.8M quarterly loss and $973,000 revenue in one quarter) and the platform has modest user counts compared with mainstream rivals, though it spikes after major Trump posts [2] [3] [4].
1. What Truth Social is and why it exists
Truth Social was launched as an alternate platform where Trump and his supporters could post after he was banned from major networks; Britannica describes it as a 2022 app created primarily in response to his suspension from mainstream platforms [1]. Wikipedia traces the platform’s early rollout, licensing interactions and financial history, noting losses and a public merger that brought the parent company to Nasdaq [3].
2. Who controls it and how it makes money
The app is owned by Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG) and related public entities; quarterly SEC filings reported by Forbes say the company posted $973,000 in revenue and a $54.8 million net loss in one recent quarter, indicating the business is losing money far faster than it earns it [2]. Wikipedia’s corporate history also documents earlier cumulative losses and the company’s move to go public via a blank-check merger [3].
3. Audience size and platform dynamics
Truth Social remains far smaller than major social networks. Wikipedia and industry reporting estimate user numbers in the low millions and describe the platform as niche; Forbes data show Truth Social can gain traction episodically—its traffic spikes when Trump makes major announcements [3] [4]. That pattern undercuts claims that it has broadly replaced mainstream platforms for large swaths of the public [4].
4. Content, moderation and technological features
The platform publishes Trump’s posts and archives of his output are independently mirrored by third-party archives (Trump’s Truth archive is an example) but also faces scrutiny over AI content and moderation. The Guardian reported episodes of frenetic posting—including dozens of posts in hours and AI-generated videos that the paper could not independently verify—highlighting how Truth Social can be a vector for both direct messaging and ambiguous, AI-driven media [5]. Snopes reported that Truth Social even added an AI chatbot (Truth Search AI) powered by Perplexity that in some cases disputes Trump’s own false or misleading claims, illustrating internal tensions between platform tools and political messaging [6].
5. Political role and usage in 2024–25 cycle
Reporting shows Truth Social is a primary broadcast channel for Trump’s real-time reactions to elections, policy and controversies. Politico and Snopes documented examples where Trump posted reactions to election results and pushed back against coverage, while Politico tracked the platform’s use in what it described as a “flood-the-zone” strategy around the Epstein controversy [7] [8]. Britannica’s timeline also places Truth Social at the center of Trump’s communications since his return to public office [1].
6. Criticism, legal and reputational headwinds
The platform and parent company face financial strain and public skepticism—Forbes emphasizes the substantial quarterly losses [2], and other outlets chronicle outages and operational challenges [9]. Independent fact-checkers and reporters have flagged posts and claims from Trump on Truth Social as misleading or disputed; Snopes specifically noted that the platform’s AI sometimes contradicts Trump’s statements [6]. Some critics read the site as a curated political megaphone rather than a neutral public square [5] [7].
7. Competing viewpoints and implicit agendas
Supporters present Truth Social as a free-speech refuge for conservative voices and a direct line from Trump to followers [1]. Critics argue it functions as a partisan echo chamber and a fundraising/branding vehicle for Trump, pointing to episodic spikes in engagement tied to his posts and the company’s precarious finances [4] [2]. Archive projects and independent trackers (e.g., “Trump’s Truth”) aim to preserve posts for accountability, indicating civic actors treat the platform as a consequential source worth monitoring [10].
8. What reporting does not (yet) cover in these sources
Available sources do not mention detailed demographic breakdowns of Truth Social users beyond general “small but spiking” metrics, long-term product roadmaps from TMTG, or independent technical audits of the platform’s moderation algorithms and ad policies; those specifics are not found in current reporting provided here [1] [2] [3].
Bottom line: Truth Social is a politically consequential but commercially fragile platform—explicitly built as an alternative outlet for Trump, influential within its niche but far from replacing mainstream networks—and it draws both organized pro-Trump advocacy and systematic scrutiny from reporters, fact-checkers and archivists [1] [2] [6] [10].