Where can archived social‑media posts or press statements from Dr. Jennifer Ashton be found for 2023–2026 denials of weight‑loss product endorsements?
Executive summary
Archived denials and press statements by Dr. Jennifer Ashton about purported endorsements of weight‑loss products in 2023–2026 are available through several verifiable trails: her own public channels (including emailed statements referenced in reporting and her platform Ajenda), mainstream fact‑check organizations that preserved her denials, and investigative/scam‑watch reporting that reproduces her statements or summarizes them; however, many commercial pages and social posts invoking her name are fraudulent deepfakes or scam pages rather than primary sources [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Where to find primary archived statements: Dr. Ashton’s verified channels
The clearest starting points are Dr. Ashton’s own verified public outlets: reporting notes she provided emailed statements that were appended to news updates, and she operates a branded site/portal “Ajenda” where her communications and commentary are published, both of which have been used as sources in updates to news coverage [1] [3].
2. Press‑statement reproductions preserved by mainstream news and fact‑check outlets
Major fact‑check publishers preserved and updated articles that reproduce Dr. Ashton’s denials — for example, Snopes and a Yahoo Entertainment fact check both document and updated their pieces to include Ashton’s emailed statements denying endorsements of keto or gummy products, making those fact‑check pages useful archived records of her denials [2] [1].
3. Investigative and consumer‑protection writeups that quote her denials
Independent scam trackers, investigative bloggers, and university annotation projects have reproduced her warnings and summarized her position while tracing the fake ads; these include analyses that explicitly state she “has absolutely no connection” to products like LipoLess/BurnSlim and that many ads use AI/manipulated media — these articles serve as corroborating archives when primary social posts have been removed [4] [5] [6].
4. Where not to trust archived claims: marketplace pages and review sites
Many commercial product pages, affiliate sites and some review pages repeat supposed endorsements but are themselves unreliable and often flagged by researchers; Trustpilot listings and promotional pages commonly reuse her name falsely, and investigators note these are marketing artifacts rather than authoritative records of Dr. Ashton’s statements [7] [8].
5. How fact‑checkers and archives documented the timeline (2023–2026)
Reporting shows a pattern: scam ads surfaced in summer 2023 and fact‑checkers updated their coverage in mid‑September 2023 to include an emailed statement from Ashton; later reporting through 2025–2026 continues to reiterate that she never endorsed these weight‑loss gummies or gelatin tricks, and that AI‑generated deepfakes are frequently the mechanism for the false endorsements [1] [2] [6] [4].
6. Practical verification steps using archived sources
To corroborate any specific denial, consult the Snopes and Yahoo fact‑check pages (which include Ashton’s emailed text), check her Ajenda site for original posts, and use investigative summaries that reproduce her language; treat product pages, affiliate content, and user reviews as suspect unless they link to or reproduce a verifiable primary statement from her or a reputable news outlet [2] [1] [3] [4].
7. Limitations and caveats in the public record
Available reporting documents multiple reproduced statements and an emailed denial, but this collection is piecemeal — not every social post or press release is linked to a permanent archival URL in the examined sources, and some pages that claim to show her endorsement are demonstrably fake; where a specific original social post is not reproduced by a reputable outlet, the sources do not provide a direct archived social‑media permalink to every denial [1] [4] [6].