Where can the original Substack URL and archived copies of Lisa Noelle Voldeng’s November 23, 2025 post be accessed?

Checked on January 19, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The original November 23, 2025 Substack post by Lisa Noelle Voldeng—reported under the title “Don’t Worry, Boys are Hard to Find”—was published on her Substack publication and is reachable from her Substack profile and publication pages, and at least one archived snapshot of her Substack content exists on archive.ph; reporting about the upload and related audio files has been carried by several outlets that reference her Substack posts [1] [2] [3] [4]. Independent coverage and analysis of the material have appeared on news and commentary sites that link back to or describe the Substack publication [5] [6] [7].

1. Where the original Substack post is hosted and how to find it

The primary location for Voldeng’s work is her Substack presence: the general account/profile is available at substack.com/@lvoldeng, which serves as the hub for her posts and notes [2], while her publication “outlaws of chivalry” is run from the Substack domain lisevoldeng.substack.com where her essays and uploads are posted [3]. Contemporary reporting about the specific November 23–24 uploads cites those Substack entries directly, and Substack-native notes connected to the account reference the uploaded audio and the multi-part series released around that date [8] [1].

2. Archived copies and publicly accessible snapshots

At least one archived snapshot of Voldeng’s Substack publication has been captured on the public web archive service archive.ph, which holds a snapshot of the “outlaws of chivalry” Substack landing page and can be used to view what was publicly visible on that Substack at the time of archiving [4]. Media reporting and specialist newsletters that examined the uploads also preserve descriptions, excerpts, and investigative commentary that function as secondary archives of the material—examples include Hindustan Times, News24, FrontPage Detectives, and other writeups that summarize or quote the Substack content [5] [7] [6].

3. Verification, metadata and discrepancies in reporting

Multiple outlets report that the November 23 entry contained extensive unredacted audio and a multi-part series of files attributed to interviews with a man named Sascha (Sascha/Sascha Barrows) Riley, and Substack notes from late November identify uploads of “un-redacted audio recordings” and part designations in the series [1] [8] [6]. While those secondary reports and the Substack notes corroborate the fact of a November release of audio material via Voldeng’s Substack, the available reporting also flags that the material remains heavily contested and unverified, with some commentators and researchers calling for standard authentication steps (identity checks, audio forensics, documentation mapping) before treating the uploads as corroborated evidence [6] [1].

4. Alternate venues and mirrors to check

Beyond the Substack profile and the publication page, viewers seeking the original item should consult both the direct Substack publication URLs (substack.com/@lvoldeng and lisevoldeng.substack.com) and public web archives such as archive.ph where snapshots of the Substack landing page have been saved [2] [3] [4]. Specialist newsletters and investigative summaries—such as the FrontPage Detectives special report and multiple mainstream writeups—offer preserved descriptions and excerpts that can serve as corroborating sources if the live Substack content is removed or restricted [6] [5] [7].

5. Limitations and what remains unclear in the public record

The reporting collated here confirms the Substack origin and the existence of at least one public archive snapshot, but it does not provide a canonical permalink to the exact November 23 post retained by independent archives beyond the Substack domain itself; the sources document the publication and subsequent coverage rather than a single authoritative external mirror of the full post and audio files [1] [8] [4]. Where preservation and verification are essential, researchers should combine live Substack URLs with archived snapshots and contemporaneous reporting to reconstruct what was publicly released and what remains unverified [6].

Want to dive deeper?
How can web archives like archive.ph be used to verify and preserve Substack posts?
What standard forensic methods assess the authenticity of leaked audio recordings?
How have media organizations handled and fact-checked viral Substack leaks in past high-profile cases?