Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Where can I read original reporting and legal documents detailing the O’Reilly allegations and settlements?
Executive summary
If you want original reporting and court documents about the Bill O’Reilly allegations and related settlements, major news organizations (The New York Times, Reuters, The Guardian) and court-focused outlets (Courthouse News) published contemporaneous reporting; a federal judge’s 2018 ruling made several previously confidential settlement agreements public and those reports summarize key figures — for example, reporting has cited a $32 million settlement tied to Lis Wiehl and roughly $13 million in earlier settlements totaling about $45 million when later tallies are included [1] [2] [3]. For primary legal documents, search for the defamation and related civil filings that prompted the judge’s order to unseal settlements; Courthouse News and local court dockets were the outlets that reported the judge ordered the documents exposed [4] [5].
1. Where to start: authoritative news investigations
The New York Times’ investigative reporting — summarized and amplified by outlets such as The Guardian, Reuters and Vogue — is the primary contemporary source that first tied together multiple settlements and provided the numbers and context later cited across the press [1] [2] [6]. Read those original Times stories where possible; secondary accounts in Reuters and The Guardian reliably summarize the Times’ findings and note the amounts and timing [1] [7].
2. Which outlets published the settlement details after they were unsealed
After a federal judge refused to keep the settlement agreements sealed in the defamation litigation, outlets including The Cut, The Hill and Courthouse News reported that judge Deborah Batts ordered many settlement details made public; those articles explain what the unsealed agreements revealed about confidentiality clauses and restrictions on the women who settled [8] [5] [4]. Use those stories as guides to what the court order made available.
3. How to find the original court filings and unsealed agreements
Court dockets for the related federal defamation suits are the primary source for the unsealed settlement agreements. Courthouse News described the judge’s order to expose the settlements and is a direct pointer to the relevant federal court action [4]. Look up the specific defamation case names (reported in news stories) in PACER or the clerk’s office of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York — news reports indicate that judge Deborah Batts presided over the matter that led to unsealing [5] [8]. Available sources do not list the exact docket number; use the case party names from reporting to retrieve filings [4] [8].
4. What the unsealed agreements revealed and reporting highlights
Reporting on the unsealed documents emphasized unusual confidentiality terms — including restrictions on discussing evidence and gag-like provisions — and provided settlement amounts for some cases (for example, Rebecca Gomez Diamond’s disclosed $3.25 million payment and public reporting of a $32 million payment linked to Lis Wiehl) [8] [3]. News analyses framed the $32 million figure as “highly unusual” and discussed legal commentary about why a payout that large would be reached [9] [10].
5. Totals, timelines and differing tallies
Different outlets aggregate the settlements differently: Reuters reported about $13 million for five women in earlier reporting, while other outlets and later analyses cited totals of roughly $45 million when additional settlements and the $32 million figure are included; to reconcile numbers, consult the original Times pieces and the unsealed agreements themselves [7] [2] [1]. Journalists and law professors noted the $32 million payment as extraordinary and debated whether it reflected particularly severe allegations or other settlement dynamics [9] [10].
6. Alternative perspectives and defenses reported
O’Reilly and his representatives repeatedly denied wrongdoing; Deadline and Fox News reported O’Reilly’s statements and the network’s responses, and news stories preserve those denials alongside settlement disclosures, allowing readers to see both allegations and the subject’s defense [11] [12]. Legal commentary published alongside the reporting also offered alternative explanations for large payouts (e.g., to avoid public harm to family or during other negotiations), which were reported by outlets such as TheWrap and Stanford Law School’s commentary [10] [9].
7. Practical next steps to read originals yourself
1) Read the New York Times investigative pieces cited by other outlets (referenced across Reuters, Guardian and others) for context and names [1] [7]. 2) Use the case party names and judge’s name (as reported) to search PACER or the Southern District of New York docket to retrieve the unsealed settlement agreements and defamation filings [4] [8] [5]. 3) Consult Courthouse News for court-order coverage and links to filings when available [4]. If you need, I can extract the case names and likely docket search terms from these news pieces to help locate the federal docket entries [4] [8].
Limitations: available sources do not provide the exact PACER docket number in the summaries above; to obtain original filings you will likely need to search PACER or the relevant court clerk’s database using party names and judge Deborah Batts as reported [4] [5].