Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Where can I find primary-source interviews or recordings with eyewitnesses who back Katie Johnson?

Checked on November 16, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Primary-source interviews or recordings tied to the pseudonymous “Katie Johnson” exist in archival and news outlets: the Digital Indy archive hosts a taped interview transcript with Katie L. Johnson Wilson (linked as an interview record) [1], and contemporary reporting from Sacramento News & Review and national outlets like PBS referenced video or Daily Mail interviews in 2016 when the “Katie Johnson” story first circulated [2] [3]. Coverage is uneven: some items are direct interview transcripts or clips, while many mainstream reports describe or quote interviews rather than providing full primary recordings [1] [2] [3].

1. Where to find an actual taped interview or transcript

The Digital Indy collection includes a “Taped interview with Katie L. Johnson Wilson (transcript),” which appears to be a direct primary-source item you can access through that archive for a verbatim record of an interview [1]. That is the clearest primary-source record among the provided results; use the Digital Indy URL to view the transcript and any accompanying metadata or audio there [1].

2. News outlets that reported or quoted her interviews in 2016

Contemporaneous reporting from outlets such as Sacramento News & Review covered the “Katie Johnson” story in detail, noting a video purporting to show Johnson being interviewed and describing efforts by third parties to publicize her claims [2]. PBS’s recap of assault allegations mentions that “Doe, using the name ‘Johnson,’ gave an interview to the Daily Mail,” which indicates that mainstream outlets quoted or summarized her interviews even if they did not always host the full original recording themselves [3].

3. Types of primary-source material you can expect to find

Available sources show three common kinds of primary items: (a) archived taped interviews or transcripts (Digital Indy’s item) [1]; (b) video clips or alleged interview footage circulated online and referenced by reporting (Sacramento News & Review described an unblurred image from a video interview) [2]; and (c) quoted interview text or summaries in news reports (PBS notes a Daily Mail interview) [3]. If you need raw audio/video, prioritize archives that host original files (example: Digital Indy) or media organizations’ multimedia sections that might keep original uploads.

4. What mainstream reporting adds and how it differs from primary sources

Investigative and news pieces often contextualize or question the credibility of the interview material: Sacramento News & Review reported skepticism and traced contacts around the circulated video, noting both advocacy groups who urged further investigation and attempts to verify Johnson’s identity [2]. PBS summarized the allegation set alongside other accounts of assault, relying on the interview as a source but embedding it within broader reporting on multiple allegations [3]. That means news stories are useful for context but are secondary: they interpret, summarize, and sometimes challenge the primary interview content [2] [3].

5. Conflicting perspectives and limits in the record

Reporting shows disagreement about how to treat the “Katie Johnson” material: some advocacy actors believed and promoted her claims in 2016 (as Sacramento News & Review reported), while other outlets and legal filings produced mixed outcomes, including a dismissed lawsuit mentioned in the same coverage [2]. The provided sources do not offer a comprehensive catalog of every eyewitness who “backs” Katie Johnson; they instead document the interview[4], media circulation, legal filings, and differing reactions [2] [3]. Available sources do not mention a compiled set of multiple eyewitness audio recordings explicitly backing her beyond what these reports describe [1] [2] [3].

6. Practical next steps to locate more primary recordings

Start with the Digital Indy taped interview/transcript [1]. Search major news archives (Daily Mail as cited by PBS) and video-indexing services for the 2016 clips mentioned in reporting [3] [2]. Review the Sacramento News & Review piece for leads: it names people and documents (including an unblurred image and a 10-page document) that could point to original video sources or the individuals who arranged interviews [2]. If you need legal documents or filings connected to “Katie Johnson,” EL PAÍS’ explainer indicates the pseudonymous plaintiff’s civil suit and its place in later reporting, which may point to court records to supplement interviews [5].

Limitations: the provided results include a direct archival interview transcript and multiple news references, but they do not offer a compiled list of eyewitness audio files or an exhaustive repository of every person who publicly “backs” Katie Johnson; further searching in media archives, court records, and the Daily Mail archive is necessary [1] [2] [3] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
Which news outlets conducted on-the-record interviews with eyewitnesses supporting Katie Johnson?
Are there archived audio or video recordings of eyewitness testimony backing Katie Johnson available online?
Do court filings or depositions contain sworn eyewitness statements that corroborate Katie Johnson?
Can local library or historical society archives provide oral-history interviews about Katie Johnson's case?
How can I verify the authenticity and chain of custody for eyewitness recordings claiming to support Katie Johnson?