Where can the original Substack audio files and full transcripts of William Sasha Riley's testimony be accessed?
Executive summary
The six unredacted audio files of William "Sascha" Riley’s interviews were published publicly on a Substack run by Lisa Noelle Voldeng on November 23, 2025, and those audio files are the primary source for the viral material circulating online [1]. A separate Substack post republishes a full, multi‑hour written transcription of the interviews — described as 4+ hours of material — on the 8secondthings Substack page, while podcasts and news outlets have amplified and summarized the tapes as the broader debate over their veracity unfolded [2] [3] [4].
1. Where the original audio files were posted and who posted them
The raw audio recordings attributed to Riley were released in a Substack article by Lisa Noelle Voldeng, who posted six unredacted interview files alongside her article titled “Don’t Worry, Boys are Hard to Find” on November 23, 2025, making Voldeng’s Substack the initial public home for the primary audio evidence now circulating online [1] [5]. Multiple reporting threads and social posts identify Voldeng as the publisher of the leaked tapes and note that the release was presented by the poster as in the public interest [5] [6].
2. Where full transcripts can be accessed
A full transcription of the interviews — labeled as the William Sasha Reilly interview transcription and described as covering all 4+ hours of recorded conversation — is available on the 8secondthings Substack page, which has published the verbatim transcript of the sessions attributed to Riley [2]. That transcription appears to have been prepared and posted independently of Voldeng’s Substack release, providing readers with a searchable, text‑based version of the audio material [2].
3. Other repositories, amplifiers, and derivative materials
Podcast coverage and independent creators have republished, summarized, or critiqued the tapes: the High & Low podcast, for example, ran multi‑part episodes analyzing and fact‑checking the Riley tapes and explicitly warned listeners about graphic content while outlining major takeaways from the six interview tapes [3]. Social media users have also extracted the material into timelines and PDFs — one Threads post links to a PDF timeline derived from the Substack audio — showing how the recordings have been rehosted and repackaged across platforms [6].
4. What these sources do and do not establish about authenticity
News outlets covering the story emphasize that the recordings and transcripts remain unverified by law enforcement or courts and note that the Department of Justice has not independently authenticated Riley’s claims or placed his name in the unsealed Epstein files thus far; mainstream outlets report that neither the DOJ nor courts have corroborated the testimony in the recordings (p1_s4; [7]; [8]