Which major news outlets have documented specific missed prophecies by Julie Green and what examples did they cite?
Executive summary
Major mainstream coverage of Julie Green’s prophetic claims that cites specific failed or implausible prophecies is limited in the reporting provided; Rolling Stone is the clearest major outlet here, highlighting sensational predictions such as an allegation that Prince Charles would murder Queen Elizabeth and conspiratorial claims about President Joe Biden’s identity [1]. Other items in the search corpus are partisan blogs, prophecy aggregators, or critics that attack her legitimacy but do not amount to additional mainstream news documentation of particular missed prophecies [2] [3] [4].
1. Rolling Stone: the single major outlet in the set that named specific, testable claims
Rolling Stone reported on Julie Green’s public prophecies and explicitly quoted or summarized dramatic assertions—most prominently that Green predicted Prince Charles would murder Queen Elizabeth and that the “real Joe Biden is dead” and a body double controlled by others was being presented publicly—framing those as public prophetic claims tied to her visibility at political events [1].
2. What Rolling Stone actually documented about failure or falsifiability
The Rolling Stone piece recorded the content of Green’s prophecies and placed them in a political context—such as her appearance at a campaign rally—thereby giving readers the material needed to later judge whether those prophecies were fulfilled; the article did not appear in the provided snippet to catalogue a list titled “missed prophecies,” but it did surface prophecies that are readily falsifiable in time (for example, claims about the status of public figures) [1].
3. Other sources in the sample are critical or devotional, not mainstream fact‑checking
The remaining documents in the bundle are a mix: MarketFaith Ministries presents a rebuttal or defense of Green and frames critiques as fraudulent or inaccurate while asking whether she has made inaccurate prophecies [2]; ProphecyIndex aggregates prophetic claims and conspiratorial narratives but is not a mainstream news outlet documenting missed prophecies [3]; and a Christianity‑oriented blog condemns Green as a false prophet without cataloguing mainstream, journalistic fact‑checked misses [4]. These sources therefore reflect advocacy and criticism rather than independent major‑media inventories of predictions gone wrong [2] [3] [4].
4. How to interpret “documented missed prophecies” in this reporting set
If “documented” means a mainstream news outlet listing specific prophecies that later failed, the provided reporting shows only Rolling Stone naming high‑profile, falsifiable claims made by Green, rather than a systematic mainstream tally of “missed” prophecies; if “documented” includes partisan blogs and prophecy indexes, then additional criticisms and accusations appear in the MarketFaith rebuttal and in the Crossing Swords blog, but those sources carry explicit agendas and are not equivalent to independent journalistic verification [1] [2] [4].
5. Alternative viewpoints and agendas in the record
Supporters and some sympathetic ministries defend Green and counter that she has prophecies that have come to pass and denounce critiques as “fraudulent” or ideologically motivated, which is the posture taken in the MarketFaith rebuttal [2]; conversely, devotional and conservative Christian bloggers deploy theological arguments to reject contemporary prophetic claims more broadly and list Green among many alleged “false prophets,” indicating a theological as well as a reputational agenda behind some criticisms [4].
6. Limitations of the available reporting and implications for readers
The evidence set here does not include a comprehensive mainstream audit (Washington Post, NYT, AP, BBC, etc.) cataloguing Green’s misses; instead, it contains one mainstream magazine story that highlighted sensational, falsifiable prophecies and several partisan or niche sources offering praise or condemnation—readers seeking a definitive list of “missed prophecies” should look for follow‑up fact‑checks or timelines from major newsrooms or independent analysts not present in the supplied materials [1] [2] [4].