Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What credible sources reported an American flag on the ground at the White House and do they include photos or videos?
Executive summary
Multiple mainstream outlets reported photos showing an American flag lying on the ground at the White House as President Trump returned from Mar‑a‑Lago on Nov. 16–17, 2025; Newsweek and People explicitly describe images and note the viral social‑media spread [1] [2]. Reporting says some outlets used agency/Getty photos (AFP/Getty credit appears in coverage) and that the White House has disputed that the flag touched the ground or offered no immediate detailed explanation in some stories [3] [2] [1].
1. What was reported and who covered it — quick inventory
Newsweek, People, AS USA, Mediaite, Distractify, AOL and other outlets published pieces flagging — and publishing — photos circulating online showing a U.S. flag on the ground on the White House South Lawn as Trump walked by on Nov. 16–17, 2025 [1] [2] [4] [5] [6] [3]. Several items explicitly say the image circulated first on social platforms and was then picked up by those outlets [4] [5].
2. Do the reports include photos or video?
Yes. Coverage cites and republishes photographic images; some articles attribute images to wire/agency photographers (MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty is named in at least one story) and show stills of the scene [3]. Multiple outlets quote or embed social‑media posts that include images [4] [5] [6]. Available sources do not mention a publicly released White House video contradicting the still photos, though some reporting references additional footage being reviewed by observers [6].
3. What the reporting says about whether the flag actually touched the ground
Outlets note the apparent violation of U.S. flag etiquette — Title 4 of the U.S. Flag Code — which states the flag should never touch the ground; Newsweek and People cite that guidance [1] [2]. At least one report says the White House denied the flag was touching the ground [2]. Newsweek reported the White House had not publicly explained the circumstance at the time of its piece [1].
4. How the images circulated and the role of social media
Multiple stories trace attention to social posts and viral tweets that highlighted the image and prompted commentary and re‑posts by journalists and political commentators [4] [5] [7]. Some articles embed the same social posts and screenshots that amplified the allegation [6] [5].
5. Reporters’ attempts to explain what happened — competing accounts
Journalists quoted or referenced observers offering different explanations: one theory blamed Marine One rotor wash blowing the flag down; another noted the flag may have been down before the helicopter arrived and that additional footage was being reviewed [1] [6]. The White House denial that the flag touched the ground (as cited in People) contradicts the visual interpretation in several still images [2].
6. What sources explicitly confirm (and what they do not)
Confirmed by reporting: mainstream outlets published photos or credited agency images that show a flag on or near the ground behind the President as he returned to the White House [1] [3]. Not confirmed in current reporting: a formal, detailed White House account explaining exactly how or when the flag contacted the ground — Newsweek says no public explanation had been issued at that time [1]. Available sources do not mention a White House press release with timestamped video that authoritatively settles whether the flag actually touched the ground.
7. Context: new flagpoles and timing
Coverage notes that new flagpoles were added to the South (and North) Lawns in 2025 — context relevant to accounts about the flag’s placement and vulnerability — and outlets cite White House social posts from June about raising new flagpoles [8] [9]. That context underlies explanations invoking rotor wash or installation timing [1] [6].
8. How to judge credibility and remaining uncertainties
Photos attributed to wire services (AFP/Getty) and reporting from established outlets lend credibility that images exist showing a flag on the lawn [3] [1]. But eyewitness interpretation differs from official denials: outlets report both the visual evidence and the White House’s contention that it did not touch the ground [2]. Because the White House had not (in these pieces) published definitive time‑stamped video or an explanatory statement, available sources leave an unresolved factual question about the exact sequence and whether the fabric physically contacted the ground [1] [2].
If you want, I can collect the specific photo credits and embed‑link the posts cited in these stories so you can examine the images and timestamps yourself.