Who founded and currently owns this website?

1. Why the question can’t be answered directly from these sources

The documents provided include founder/ownership details for several well‑known organisations (Google, W3C/Tim Berners‑Lee, WordPress/Automattic, Blinkit, Nike background, etc.) but none identify “this website” that you referenced. Available sources do not mention the URL or brand you asked about, so I cannot state who founded or currently owns your unspecified site without additional information (not found in current reporting).

2. Examples of founder/owner information in the packet

When sources do name founders and owners, they give clear attribution: Britannica reports Google was founded in 1998 by Sergey Brin and Larry Page ^[1]. The W3C site and Wikipedia describe Tim Berners‑Lee as the founder and Emeritus Director of the World Wide Web Consortium and credit him as the web’s inventor ^{[2] [3]}. Tracxn lists Blinkit’s founders as Saurabh Kumar, Rishi Arora and Albinder Dhindsa ^[5]. Use of these sources shows the pattern: named, reputable profiles or company databases provide founder/ownership data ^{[1] [2] [3] [5]}.

3. How to get the answer for your specific site — what the packet recommends

A practical guide in the results explains how to discover who built or owns a website: check the site’s contact or “About” pages, look up the domain with WHOIS, or search the domain name in news and company databases ^[6]. That article is explicit about steps non‑journalists use when public reporting doesn’t already record the founder/owner ^[6].

4. When founders remain owners — patterns and caveats

The packet shows common ownership outcomes: founders sometimes retain control or voting power (example: Nike co‑founder Phil Knight retains influence via voting shares per a profile summary, p1_s8), while other founders step aside or sell stakes (examples across tech firms in the results). But ownership can be complex — partial stakes, trusts, corporate holding companies or public shareholders — and the provided summaries show that one must consult up‑to‑date filings or news reports for current ownership stakes ^{[7] [8]}.

5. Conflicting or evolving narratives in the results

The sources present competing dynamics: some entries are institutional (Britannica, W3C) presenting long‑established founder facts ^{[1] [2]}, while others (Wikipedia entries and company databases) contain rolling updates about leadership changes and legal disputes — for example, reporting about Matt Mullenweg and Automattic includes litigation and governance controversy into 2024–2025 ^[4]. Those differences underline that founder attribution is stable, ownership or control can change and must be verified in current reporting ^[4].

6. What I can do next if you provide the site

If you give the exact URL or site name, I will check the provided search results again for any matching entry; if it’s not in this packet, I will use the recommended steps from the Bluehost/Bluehost‑style guide (WHOIS, About/Contact pages, press filings) and report findings with citations ^[6]. If the site matches one of the sources above (Google, W3C, Blinkit, WordPress/Automattic, etc.), I will cite the exact passage that names the founder and any ownership details from these documents ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]}.

Limitations and transparency: I used only the excerpts you supplied. The packet contains founder/owner facts for several organisations but does not mention the unnamed website in your question; therefore I cannot assert its founders or owners without additional input or sources (available sources do not mention the specific site).