Who funds Factually (file a 501c3 irs form- yes or no)? who runs factually -- leadership and researchers and others? who are the major donors of Factually? What is Factually's history?
Executive summary
Factually — as represented in the materials supplied — appears as a private company working in the health-information or “fact” technology space (Factually Health / Factually Inc.) rather than as a U.S. public charity, and there is no documentation in the provided reporting that it has filed Form 1023 to obtain 501(c) status with the IRS (Factually Health is described on Crunchbase; the IRS process for 501(c) requires Form 1023/1023‑EZ) [1] [2]. Public records from the U.K. show an incorporated entity named FACTUALLY LIMITED with filing history at Companies House, but the supplied sources do not identify U.S.‑side leadership rosters, donor lists, or any IRS determination letter revealing major funders or nonprofit status [3] [4].
1. What the sources actually say about Factually’s legal form and tax status
Crunchbase summarizes a commercial venture called Factually Health or Factually Inc., describing a for‑profit product that uses proprietary technology and AI to combat health misinformation rather than identifying it as a tax‑exempt charity, and there is no Crunchbase evidence in the provided clip showing a 501(c) filing or IRS determination letter for that entity [1]. Separately, U.K. corporate records list a FACTUALLY LIMITED with a filing history at Companies House, which confirms an incorporated business exists in the U.K. but says nothing about U.S. nonprofit filings or donor transparency obligations [3]. The IRS guidance pulled into this packet establishes the procedure for applying for 501(c) status — Form 1023 or 1023‑EZ filed electronically via Pay.gov — but does not document Factually as an applicant or beneficiary of that process in the supplied sources [2] [4].
2. Who runs Factually — what the record supplied does and does not show
The supplied Crunchbase excerpt frames Factually as an operational company (Factually Inc./Factually Health) but includes no executive names, board roster, researchers, or staff biographies in the materials provided, and the Companies House snapshot lists corporate filing history and officers for the U.K. entity without supplying the leadership list in the excerpt here [1] [3]. Because those primary organizational details are not present in the supplied reporting, it is not possible from these sources to authoritatively name Factually’s CEOs, researchers, founders, or trustees; the IRS pages included explain what nonprofits must disclose in Form 1023 and Form 990 filings but do not substitute for organization‑specific leadership disclosures that simply aren’t in the packet [5] [6].
3. Who funds Factually — available evidence and limits
None of the supplied materials contains a donor roster, major funder disclosures, grant listings, or Schedule B/990 forms tied to Factually; Crunchbase sometimes reports funding rounds for startups but the provided Crunchbase snippet describes the product and sector rather than listing investors or philanthropic backers [1]. U.K. Companies House filings can disclose certain company accounts and officer roles, but the excerpt here is limited to a filing‑history reference and does not enumerate investors or grants [3]. The IRS guidance confirms that genuine 501(c) organizations must file Form 990 annually — a route by which donors can sometimes be traced — but no Form 990 or donor filings for Factually were supplied [6].
4. Factually’s history — what can be established and what remains opaque
From the supplied evidence, Factually exists at least as a branded company product focused on health information technology (Factually Health / Factually Inc.) and a similarly named corporate entity exists in the U.K. with filings at Companies House, indicating incorporation and routine corporate filings, but there is no supplied chronology linking those facts into a detailed founding date, incorporation timeline on the U.S. side, or a narrative of fundraising rounds, pivots, acquisitions, or research outputs [1] [3]. The IRS materials in the packet explain how organizations document and change legal status over time, which is useful context if one were investigating whether Factually pursued tax‑exempt status, but those IRS documents do not provide organization‑specific history for Factually in the supplied set [4].
5. Bottom line and next steps for verification
Based solely on the reporting provided, there is no documentary support that Factually has filed for or been granted 501(c) status (the IRS procedures are cited but no determination for Factually is shown), nor are leadership names or major donors present in these excerpts — the available evidence points to a private company presence (Crunchbase) and a U.K. corporate registration (Companies House), not a U.S. public charity with disclosed donors or Form 990 transparency [2] [4] [1] [3]. To conclude definitively would require reviewing: the IRS exempt organizations database (EO Select Check), Factually’s own corporate or “About” pages and press releases for leadership lists, Crunchbase or PitchBook funding pages for investor details, Companies House full officer records, and any Form 990s or state charity registrations if a U.S. nonprofit arm exists — none of which are included in the supplied sources.