Who funds MeidasTouch and what are their known donors?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
MeidasTouch is funded primarily through small-dollar grassroots donations, merchandise and ad revenue as a media network, and has an affiliated political arm — a Super PAC/committee — that reports donors to federal regulators; OpenSecrets lists top donors and cycle-by-cycle disclosures for the MeidasTouch PAC/committee (see donor and outside‑spending pages) [1] [2] [3]. Independent reporting and watchdogs note that MeidasTouch also solicited split donations in 2020 (part to campaigns, part to the PAC), a practice documented by Rolling Stone and discussed in Columbia Journalism Review [4] [5].
1. Who exactly is “MeidasTouch” and why funding is split across entities
MeidasTouch refers to both a for‑profit media operation that raises money from audiences (donations, subscriptions, merchandise, ad revenue) and an affiliated political committee/Super PAC that runs election spending and must file donor disclosures; Crunchbase and net‑worth summaries describe audience revenue streams while OpenSecrets holds the PAC records [6] [7] [1] [2]. MeidasTouch’s founders have used multiple structures (network, PAC / Democracy Defense Fund) so reporting about “who funds MeidasTouch” depends on whether you mean the media network’s audience funding or the PAC’s political donors [5] [2].
2. What the public filings show: OpenSecrets donor pages
Federal‑level donor and outside‑spending disclosures for MeidasTouch’s PAC/committee are compiled on OpenSecrets, which lists top donors by election cycle and provides summary and expenditure breakdowns for 2020 and 2022 cycles; those pages are the primary source for named donors to MeidasTouch’s political committees [1] [2] [3]. OpenSecrets’ pages indicate that donor listings can include contributions from the organization itself, its PAC, individual members or employees and their immediate families — so entries can combine multiple related sources [2].
3. Known donor practices and controversies
Reporting from Rolling Stone and follow‑ups documented that MeidasTouch used a fundraising method in 2020 where supporters clicking donation links were given the option to split their gift between Biden’s campaign and MeidasTouch’s PAC; Rolling Stone reported the arrangement and raised questions about donor messaging and transparency — the split raised more than $5 million in contributions surrounding the group’s early activism, per Rolling Stone’s reporting [4]. Columbia Journalism Review and other outlets have interrogated the PAC’s evolution (renamed Democracy Defense Fund) and the founders’ dual roles in media and political spending [5].
4. Scale and internal fundraising channels
Independent profiles and the network’s own appeals show MeidasTouch relies on grassroots small donors and subscriptions plus merchandise and advertising; Crunchbase and site fundraising pitches point to donations, subscriptions and merch as core revenue streams that sustain the media side [6] [7] [8]. OpenSecrets’ PAC expenditure summaries also reveal how money is spent (media, fundraising, research) for the PAC side, giving context on priorities but not naming every individual donor on the media side [9].
5. What sources do not tell us
Available sources do not provide a comprehensive, public list of every individual or corporate backer of the MeidasTouch media network’s internal operations beyond aggregate descriptions; the most granular, named donor data in public federal filings pertains to the PAC/committee and is available via OpenSecrets [1] [2]. Private investments, undisclosed sponsorship agreements, or platform ad contracts are not itemized in the cited reporting and filings — not found in current reporting [6] [7].
6. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas
Watchdog and media critics flag potential conflicts: Media Bias/FactCheck labels MeidasTouch left‑leaning and cites “a lack of transparency with funding” as part of its mixed factual‑reporting rating, while the network and its founders present themselves as grassroots defenders of democracy and emphasize audience support [10] [5]. Rolling Stone framed the PAC fundraising tactic as an example of savvy donor engagement that produced substantial sums but also potential for misunderstanding among small donors [4]. Those divergent takes matter: critics emphasize transparency risks; the network emphasizes independent, crowd‑funded legitimacy.
7. How to verify donors yourself
For named political donors to MeidasTouch’s PAC, consult the OpenSecrets donor and outside‑spending pages for specific cycles and donor tables; those are the authoritative, public federal‑filing compilations cited here [1] [2] [3]. For the media/network revenue mix, review MeidasTouch’s own donation/subscription pages and public interviews, plus business profiles like Crunchbase and reporting in outlets such as CJR and Rolling Stone for context on fundraising methods [6] [5] [4].
Limitations: reporting and disclosure differ by entity (media network vs. PAC), and publicly available sources in this packet focus on PAC filings and select investigative coverage rather than a complete audit of private contracts or non‑federal donors [2] [4] [6].