Who is Lisa Noelle Voldeng and what other controversial tapes or leaks has she published?

Checked on February 2, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Lisa Noelle Voldeng is a Canadian Substack creator best known for the newsletter “Outlaws of Chivalry,” whose Substack account published unverified audio recordings attributed to a man named Sascha (or Sascha Barros/Sascha Riley) making explosive Jeffrey Epstein‑related claims; her location is listed as Vancouver Island and she says she personally interviewed the source [1] [2] [3]. The recordings — six hours of audio posted in late 2025 and amplified across social platforms — have drawn intense attention and skepticism because they remain unverified and Voldeng does not present herself as a conventional journalist [4] [5].

1. Who she says she is and how she presents her work

Voldeng markets herself as a Substack writer and newsletter creator behind “Outlaws of Chivalry,” with an “about” page that frames her output as sweeping and unconventional and a listed location on Vancouver Island, Canada [1] [3] [4]. Multiple outlets reporting on the viral audio note that she claims to have conducted phone interviews with the man identified as Sascha Riley between July 19 and July 24, 2025, and that she asserts possession of the original, unedited audio files and that copies were shared with police and “trusted contacts” [6] [7].

2. The tapes that made her a public figure

On or around November 23, 2025, Voldeng published an article containing six unredacted audio files of interviews with a man who claims to be an Epstein survivor and who names high‑profile figures; those recordings were then spread widely across TikTok, X, Reddit and other platforms, prompting viral debate [5] [4]. Reporting consistently stresses that the tapes and the extraordinary allegations within them remain unverified — they have not been corroborated by court records or mainstream investigative findings as of the cited coverage [2] [4].

3. How media and analysts have framed credibility and verification

News outlets and specialist trackers flagged the need for standard verification that is missing: identity confirmation for the speaker, audio authentication, mapping testimony to records, and independent corroboration — procedures that responsible reporting and forensic inquiry would require before treating the tapes as established fact [4]. Some commentators and writers who analyzed the material argue that elements of the presentation invite credulity while others warn of “algorithmic verification traps” where viral spread substitutes for rigorous proof [4] [5].

4. What other controversial tapes or leaks has Voldeng published?

Across the reporting provided, the journalism and specialty coverage repeatedly focus on the Sascha/Sascha Riley audio release as the specific incident that brought Voldeng to prominence; none of the cited pieces identify prior controversial tape leaks or earlier comparable disclosures published by her [1] [2] [4]. That absence in the assembled sources means there is no verified record in this reporting of other leaked tapes or a catalog of previous high‑profile releases by Voldeng; it would be incorrect to assert she has a track record of similar leaks without additional sources [3] [7].

5. Alternative viewpoints, agendas and the stakes of release

Supporters or allies who amplify the recordings frame them as suppressed testimony that mainstream institutions have ignored, and Voldeng’s own framing suggests urgency and moral imperative in sharing the material; critics counter that rushing sensational, uncorroborated audio can replicate historical moral panics and mislead public discourse [5] [4]. Observers note Voldeng “has not presented herself as a conventional journalist,” which matters because a non‑journalistic posture changes expected standards, incentives and the gatekeeping that typically governs the release of explosive allegations [4] [7].

6. Bottom line

Lisa Noelle Voldeng is a Substack creator whose publication of the Sascha Riley audio is the central controversial release attributed to her in contemporary reporting; the tapes are widely circulated but unverified, and the available coverage does not document other previous controversial tape leaks from her, leaving open questions about provenance, motive and corroboration that demand forensic and journalistic follow‑up [1] [4] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
What independent forensic steps are required to authenticate leaked audio in high‑profile abuse allegations?
What is known about Sascha (Sascha Barros/Sascha Riley) from public records and veteran‑service documentation?
How have social platforms and algorithms shaped the spread and verification of the Sascha Riley audio tapes?