Who is Lisa Noelle Voldeng and what is the journalistic track record for the Substack posts that publish explosive unverified claims?

1. Who she is: a Substack profile, location and persona

Public reporting identifies Lisa Noelle Voldeng as the Substack author behind Outlaws of Chivalry, a popular newsletter whose profile lists a Vancouver Island location and a small public footprint beyond Substack itself, where she appears active under the handle @lvoldeng ^{[1] [4] [5]}.

2. The viral release: what she published and when

On November 23, 2025, Voldeng published a post titled “Don’t Worry, Boys are Hard to Find” that included six unredacted audio files of interviews she says she recorded with a man named Sascha Barrows Riley and promoted those recordings widely via Substack and social platforms, which sparked viral circulation and broad media attention ^{[2] [6] [1]}.

3. The allegations in the recordings

The audio attributed to Riley contains explosive allegations linking abuse and trafficking to the Jeffrey Epstein network and names high‑profile figures; those allegations have circulated across social media and in headlines but have not been substantiated by indictments, court filings, or independent official confirmation as of the reporting available ^{[3] [1]}.

4. What Voldeng claims about sourcing and steps she took

Voldeng has written that she personally interviewed Riley and that, after contact from investigators in the summer of 2025, Riley was moved out of the United States “to safety,” and she says she selectively contacted allies, church, police and government officials with warnings — claims reported in her Substack posts and summarized by outlets covering the leak ^{[7] [1]}.

5. Independent scrutiny and journalistic verification so far

Mainstream reports and independent commentators have stressed that the material remains unverified; opinion and investigative writers have both flagged gaps in corroboration and questioned factual claims, with at least one detailed critique arguing the information presented is incorrect or lacks necessary evidence and fact‑checkers urging caution ^{[2] [3] [8]}.

6. Track record and stylistic cues of her Substack output

Voldeng’s Substack output mixes first‑hand narrative, inflammatory language, and archival‑style claims — including posts that make graphic and sweeping assertions about abuse networks — a style that amplifies attention but, based on public reporting, has not been accompanied by the transparent release of corroborating documents or third‑party verification that would move allegations into established investigative reporting ^{[9] [2] [7]}.

7. Credibility signals, red flags, and competing interpretations

Credibility signals include her willingness to publish original audio and to name sources; red flags noted by critics include the absence of corroborating court records, limited independent footprint for both the principal subject (Riley, in some reports) and the publisher beyond Substack, and the rapid spread of serious allegations without parallel institutional confirmation — critics argue this pattern resembles earlier moral panics and requires careful evidence, while supporters argue secrecy around trafficking often delays formal corroboration ^{[2] [8] [3]}.

8. Bottom line: how to weigh Voldeng’s posts as journalism

Voldeng’s work functions more like raw-source publication and activist exposure than settled investigative journalism: she has published provocative primary material that demands scrutiny, but reporting to date shows the claims remain unverified and contested, meaning responsible consumers and reporters should treat her releases as allegations requiring independent corroboration rather than established fact ^{[2] [3] [1]}; available sources do not provide definitive proof to fully validate or debunk the recordings, and they document significant skepticism among journalists and fact‑checkers ^[8].