Who runs factually health

Are you looking for more information regarding Factually? Check out our FAQ!

Still have questions? Reach out!

Checked on December 2, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Factually Health is a Montreal-based startup founded in 2018 that builds AI-driven tools meant to surface verifiable health information for businesses and patients, and its public profiles describe product, funding and team details (PitchBook; Crunchbase) [1] [2]. The company markets an AI “Factual” assistant and integrations for hospitals, clinics and other organizations; corporate pages and recruiting listings show recent hires and product positioning, but independent journalism or regulatory filings confirming ownership, full executive roster, or valuation are not present in the provided sources [3] [4] [1].

1. Who officially runs Factually Health — available corporate profiles

Public business-data profiles (PitchBook, Crunchbase, ZoomInfo) list Factually Health as a Montreal, Quebec company and describe its core proposition — an AI-powered platform organizing health information into user-friendly categories and delivering credibility scores based on “verified medical evidence” — but none of the supplied snippets disclose a single, authoritative owner or a complete named CEO/board list in the excerpts provided [1] [2] [4]. PitchBook’s company profile promises details on executives, cap tables and investors behind a paywall, indicating those specifics exist but are not visible in the available snippets [1].

2. What the company says it does — product and positioning

Factually Health’s own website and business listings clearly position the company as selling enterprise-grade “Factual” AI assistants, conversational agents and search tools that integrate into client apps and sites, provide localized resources and factual videos, and aim to “cut through” health misinformation for hospitals, clinics, nonprofits and health companies [3] [2] [4]. The marketing language emphasizes real-time, multi-language conversational answers and a credibility scoring system tied to “verified medical evidence” [3] [1].

3. What outside business databases report

Third‑party databases echo the basic facts: Crunchbase describes the product and mission to combat health misinformation and notes Montreal headquarters; PitchBook flags the company’s founding year and that it builds AI-driven tools and has investor and funding data behind a subscription wall [2] [1]. ZoomInfo adds operational color — recent hires including a Sales & Growth Lead and communications staff — supporting the picture of a small-growth stage company scaling commercial efforts [4].

4. What we do not find in current reporting

Available sources do not mention a definitive founder/CEO name or a complete list of executives and investors in the accessible snippets; PitchBook indicates that information is collected but gated [1]. There is no independent journalism, regulatory filing, or public financial statement in the provided results that verifies ownership, specific valuation figures, or detailed investor cap table entries [1] [2].

5. How to reconcile marketing claims with available verification

Factually Health’s product claims — credibility scoring, evidence-based answers and enterprise integrations — are consistent across the company site and business listings, which together provide a coherent corporate narrative [3] [2]. However, key corroborating documents that journalists or prospective customers often seek (press coverage, peer-reviewed evaluations of the “credibility score,” or public investor disclosures) are not present in the provided data; PitchBook’s gated profile suggests those records may exist for subscribers but are not in the open snippets [1].

6. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas

Corporate and database sources share an incentive to present Factually Health as a credible, growth-stage AI health vendor: company pages and Crunchbase emphasize mission and product value; ZoomInfo highlights hiring and go‑to‑market expansion [3] [2] [4]. PitchBook’s commercial profile frames the firm in investment terms, suggesting an investor-facing narrative [1]. None of these sources is independent investigative reporting; each serves prospective customers, partners or investors and may downplay product limits or performance variability [3] [2] [1].

7. What a reader should do next to verify “who runs” the company

To settle ownership and leadership questions, consult the full PitchBook company profile or Crunchbase’s complete entry, request Factually Health’s corporate “About” or investor relations materials, or check government corporate registries in Quebec/Canada for filed directors and officers (PitchBook and Crunchbase indicate such data exists but are gated in the snippets) [1] [2]. Available sources do not mention whether such public corporate registry searches have been done.

Limitations: this analysis is restricted to the provided search results; claims beyond those snippets are not asserted. If you want, I can draft a short email template you can use to request executive and investor details from Factually Health or list specific databases and registry searches to run next.

Want to dive deeper?
Who owns Factually Health and who are its founders?
What is the organizational structure of Factually Health?
Is Factually Health affiliated with any larger media or health organizations?
Who funds Factually Health and are there declared conflicts of interest?
Who are the editorial leaders and medical reviewers at Factually Health?