Who tried to kill Candace owens

1. The core claim — who does Owens say tried to kill her

Owens publicly asserts that Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte Macron “attempted to organize” and “paid for” an assassination against her, naming a purported “high-ranking employee of the French government” as her source and alleging payments ran through French networks such as the Club des Cent and involved French forces and Israeli-linked operatives ^{[1] [6] [7]}.

2. What Owens says she did about it — notifying U.S. officials

Owens posted that “the White House and our counterterrorism agencies have confirmed receipt” of her report and temporarily took her show off the air citing safety concerns; multiple outlets repeat her statement that U.S. agencies acknowledged receiving her material, but they do not report any public investigation outcome or confirmation from U.S. authorities ^{[3] [8] [2]}.

3. Independent reporting and available official responses

Major outlets covering the story uniformly note Owens has provided no publicly available evidence supporting the assassination allegations. Journalists and fact-checkers report that the Élysée Palace, French ministries, Israeli authorities and U.S. agencies have not publicly corroborated her claims, and at least one fact-checking piece details contradictions around alleged Foreign Legion movements that undercut parts of Owens’ narrative ^{[1] [6] [2]}.

4. How this ties to Charlie Kirk’s death — Owens’ broader narrative

Owens has interwoven the claim about an attempt on her life with allegations that the Macrons — and French foreign legionnaires — were involved in the killing of conservative leader Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025. Reporting highlights that those claims about Kirk’s death are likewise unverified and have generated widespread controversy and rebuttal requests ^{[4] [5] [8]}.

5. Assessing evidence cited in public reporting

Available reporting stresses that Owens’ posts and program commentary form the primary public record of the allegations; outlets repeatedly state she has not produced corroborating documents or independent testimony in mainstream coverage. The Jerusalem Post and Euronews specifically say no evidence or official confirmation has been provided and that public statements from implicated governments were absent at the time of reporting ^{[7] [1]}.

6. Alternative perspectives and possible motives

Some commentators treat Owens’ claims as part of an ongoing pattern of conspiracy-driven reporting by her and associates — for example, prior episodes that pushed the unverified “Becoming Brigitte” theory — which has already prompted legal pushback from the Macrons claiming defamation ^{[5] [1]}. Other outlets and opinion pieces emphasize the seriousness with which any assassination allegation should be treated and criticize mainstream institutions for allegedly dismissing Owens without full public inquiry ^{[9] [10]}.

7. What reporting does not show

Available sources do not mention any publicly released investigation results, indictments, leaked documents or verified third‑party confirmations that prove a Macron-ordered plot, nor do they cite official statements by French, Israeli or U.S. agencies substantiating Owens’ central assertions ^{[1] [6] [2]}. Sources also do not provide forensic or financial evidence verifying the alleged payment channels Owens described ^[6].

8. Bottom line — credible certainty vs. open questions

Reporting to date presents Owens’ allegations loudly and extensively but without corroborating evidence; mainstream outlets and fact-checkers repeatedly note the absence of proof and the lack of official confirmations, while some commentators urge formal inquiries given the gravity of the charge ^{[1] [2] [9]}. Readers should treat Owens’ claims as unverified allegations in need of independent, documentary proof or official validation before accepting them as fact ^{[1] [3]}.