Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Larry Sanger thinks Wikipedia has gone woke
1. Summary of the results
1. Summary of the results
Larry Sanger, Wikipedia's co-founder, has indeed publicly criticized Wikipedia for what he perceives as a strong left-wing bias, particularly since 2020. He has made these claims in multiple interviews on platforms like Fox News and LockdownTV, specifically pointing to the platform's coverage of political figures, COVID-19, and social issues as evidence of this bias.
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original statement omits several crucial pieces of context:
- Wikipedia actively maintains a Neutral Point of View (NPOV) policy and officially denies having any political bias
- The platform's content is created by volunteer editors, not a central authority
- The National Review suggests any perceived bias may stem from genuine belief in factual accuracy rather than intentional manipulation
- Sanger's criticism extends beyond "wokeness" - he specifically points to systematic exclusion of conservative sources and viewpoints, particularly in political coverage
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The term "woke" oversimplifies Sanger's more specific and detailed criticisms. His actual argument focuses on:
- The systematic exclusion of conservative sources from citations
- What he sees as biased coverage of political figures like Biden and Trump
- The dominance of what he calls "establishment left" perspectives
- The alleged abandonment of Wikipedia's original neutrality policy
The use of "woke" as a descriptor benefits political commentators and media outlets who gain engagement from culture war narratives, while obscuring the more nuanced debate about how crowd-sourced information platforms should handle competing viewpoints and source reliability.