Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How do Russian military deaths in Ukraine compare to Soviet losses in Afghanistan?
Executive Summary
The central finding is that analysts disagree sharply on how Russian military deaths in Ukraine compare to Soviet losses in Afghanistan, with some estimates placing Russian fatalities in Ukraine at many times higher than Soviet Afghan losses and others offering far lower, more conservative figures; these differences reflect divergent methodologies, political perspectives, and reporting limitations [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. Key claims range from Russian casualties numbering in the hundreds of thousands or more to counts that merely exceed Soviet Afghanistan’s roughly 14,000–15,000 Soviet combat deaths, and assessing the dispute requires weighing each source’s date, scope, and possible institutional aims [1] [4] [6].
1. Extracting the competing headline claims that drive the debate
Several clear, competing claims frame public comparisons. One set of analyses asserts that Russian fatalities in Ukraine are an order of magnitude larger than Soviet losses in Afghanistan: a CSIS report claims Russian casualties number roughly 15 times Afghanistan-era Soviet deaths and suggests totals of over 950,000 casualties with a peak of 250,000 killed, while related CSIS summaries repeat the “15 times” framing and extend the comparison to Chechnya and post‑WWII conflicts [1] [2]. Other institutional claims push somewhat lower but still substantial figures; Pentagon officials reported a combined killed-or-injured estimate above 600,000, presented as exceeding combined losses in other post‑WWII conflicts [4]. Conversely, alternative tallies and Ukrainian tracking projects cite much higher cumulative counts, with one Ukrainian estimate putting killed Russian military personnel above one million, a figure that, if accurate, dwarfs Soviet Afghan fatalities by a large margin [6]. Finally, earlier reporting and analysis noted that even modest counts of Russian deaths in Ukraine had already surpassed the Soviet Afghan war’s official Soviet military death toll of around 14,000–15,000, underscoring that every credible scenario shows Ukraine’s toll outpacing Afghanistan’s Soviet fatalities [3].
2. What the underlying numbers actually are and why they diverge
The numerical landscape is fragmented because sources report different metrics—deaths vs. killed-and-wounded vs. total casualties—and because access, methodology, and timing vary. CSIS summaries describe “over 950,000 total Russian casualties” with a peak killed estimate around 250,000 and frame comparisons as “15 times” Soviet Afghanistan losses; these are high-end, aggregate‑style figures [1] [2]. The Pentagon’s published figure of “over 600,000 killed or injured” uses a similar combined-casualty metric rather than deaths alone, which makes direct death-to-death comparisons with Afghanistan’s roughly 14,453 Soviet deaths misleading unless metrics are aligned [4]. Independent trackers and Ukrainian authorities report a very broad range from tens of thousands of identified deaths to cumulative tallies exceeding a million; such divergence reflects different cutoffs, double-counting risks, and political incentives to over- or understate losses [5] [6] [3].
3. Comparing Ukraine losses to Soviet Afghanistan: apples, oranges, and timelines
Directly comparing the two conflicts requires matching scopes and timeframes. The Soviet–Afghan War ran about a decade (1979–1989) and is typically associated with roughly 14,000–15,000 Soviet military deaths, whereas the Ukraine conflict began in 2022 and has seen casualty flows concentrated over shorter, more intense periods; multiple sources conclude that even conservative modern tallies show Ukraine’s Russian losses exceed Soviet Afghan deaths, sometimes by a small multiple and sometimes by an order of magnitude depending on which measure is used [3] [5]. High-end analyses claim Russia has suffered casualties many times greater than in Afghanistan and even exceed cumulative post‑WWII Russian/Soviet war dead, but those claims rest on aggregate casualty definitions and extrapolations that are not directly comparable to Afghanistan’s death-only counts [1] [2] [4].
4. Scrutinizing sources: credibility, dates, and possible agendas
Source credibility varies: institutional analyses like CSIS (dated mid‑2025 and earlier) and Pentagon statements carry weight but use differing casualty definitions, affecting comparisons [1] [4]. Ukrainian government or affiliated trackers often publish high cumulative figures reflecting battlefield reporting and propaganda dynamics; their numbers must be treated as one data point among others [6]. Earlier think‑tank and research pieces (2023–2025) noted that Russian deaths had already exceeded Soviet Afghan official tallies, a claim that depends on the comparator chosen [3] [1]. Each source may have political or methodological incentives: defense analysts may emphasize scale to argue capability erosion, while national actors may inflate enemy losses or undercount their own. Evaluating the debate requires cross‑checking these different kinds of claims and aligning casualty definitions and timeframes [2] [5].
5. The broader context and important omissions from headline comparisons
Headline comparisons omit several crucial considerations that change interpretation: the Soviet–Afghan figures often exclude Afghan civilian deaths and focus on Soviet military fatalities, while many Ukraine-era tallies mix deaths and injuries or count irregular forces and mobilized reservists, producing larger “casualty” totals; mixing these categories produces misleading ratios [7] [5]. The geopolitical, operational, and medical differences between the conflicts matter—shorter, more mechanized high‑intensity campaigns produce different casualty patterns than decade‑long counterinsurgency campaigns—so numerical multiples alone do not capture strategic outcomes or societal impact [8] [9]. Finally, reporting biases, time lags, and incomplete battlefield access mean every estimate carries uncertainty; the public debate tends to highlight maximal figures for rhetorical impact rather than careful metric alignment [1] [4].
6. Bottom line: what can be stated with confidence today
What can be said with confidence is that Russian military losses associated with the Ukraine war have, by multiple credible accounts and across various metrics, exceeded the Soviet military deaths in Afghanistan, and that several high‑end estimates place Ukraine-era Russian casualties many times higher than Afghanistan’s Soviet fatalities, though the precise multiple depends on whether analysts compare deaths only or broader casualty categories [3] [1] [4] [5]. Policymakers and commentators should therefore avoid simplistic headline ratios and instead specify the exact metric—deaths versus killed-and-wounded, time period, and inclusion criteria—because those choices drive the strikingly different conclusions offered by the sources summarized here [2] [6].