Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Did Hamas use condoms for sending ieds into Israel
Executive summary
Reporting shows multiple credible outlets say Palestinians have in past years attached incendiary devices to inflated condoms or balloons and launched them toward southern Israel, but major fact‑checks find no documented evidence that the U.S. funded condoms were sent to Hamas or that U.S. aid purchased condoms later used for bombs [1] [2] [3]. Claims at the end of January 2025 that the U.S. “stopped $50 million being sent to Gaza to buy condoms for Hamas” were widely disputed by aid groups, press fact‑checks and analysts [3] [4] [5].
1. What the on‑the‑ground reporting says: condoms were used as floatation for incendiaries
News reporting going back to 2018 documented that people in Gaza used inflated latex condoms (and plain balloons) as cheap floatation to carry small incendiary or improvised incendiary devices across the border toward southern Israel; publications including The Jerusalem Post and photo agencies captured images and stories of such devices being prepared and launched [1] [6]. Those accounts describe a low‑tech tactic — condoms filled with air or helium attached to flammable material — rather than proof of a formal, centralized “condom‑bomb” program run by Hamas [1] [6].
2. The disputed $50 million U.S. aid claim and official pushback
In late January 2025, White House statements claimed a $50 million allotment intended for Gaza condom purchases had been stopped; multiple fact‑checks and aid groups pushed back. CNN reported that International Medical Corps said no U.S. government funding was used to procure or distribute condoms, and USAID accounting showed no contraceptive shipments to Gaza — undermining the notion that U.S. funds were directly buying condoms later used as weapons [3]. Aid experts and outlets such as Snopes, The Guardian and Semafor likewise found no evidence that $50 million had been designated to buy condoms for Gaza [2] [7] [5].
3. What fact‑checkers found about the link between U.S. funding and weaponization
Snopes concluded there is “no proof that such U.S.‑funded condoms are being used by the militant group Hamas to make bombs,” while acknowledging earlier reports (circa 2020) that Palestinians used condoms and balloons to carry small incendiary devices [2]. CNN’s fact‑check highlighted that International Medical Corps received USAID funds for Gaza medical operations but said explicitly that none of that money bought or distributed condoms [3]. Multiple analyses emphasized that even if condoms had been distributed historically via other organizations, the chain‑of‑custody claims tying U.S. purchases to Hamas weaponization were not supported by documentation [3] [5].
4. How the charge spread and why it resonated politically
The image of “condoms used as bombs” circulated widely in conservative media and social posts, and prominent figures repeated an unverified $50 million figure as a symbol of alleged waste or mismanagement; outlets including The Guardian and France24 reported on pundits and politicians amplifying the idea that U.S. aid was directly enabling attacks [7] [8]. Analysts noted the $50 million number was implausible given typical unit costs for condoms and USAID procurement records — one critique pointed out that at roughly $0.05 each, $50 million would buy about 1 billion condoms, a quantity not consistent with known humanitarian shipments [5] [4].
5. Competing viewpoints and the limits of available reporting
One strand of commentary accepts historical reporting that condoms/balloons were used for incendiary attacks (The Jerusalem Post, AFP photo captions), while a separate body of fact‑checking and aid statements rejects the claim that U.S. taxpayers funded such shipments to Hamas [1] [2] [3]. Available sources do not document a verifiable, contemporaneous U.S. contract or delivery of condoms that were then diverted to weapons by Hamas; fact‑check outlets and aid organizations explicitly stated they found no evidence of U.S.‑funded condoms ending up as IEDs [2] [3] [9].
6. What to watch next and why accuracy matters
Future reporting should produce primary procurement records, invoice chains, or supplier confirmations if anyone claims government funds bought specific items later used as weapons; absent those documents, broad claims—especially when amplified for political effect—risk conflating past localized tactics (condoms used as floatation) with contemporary U.S. budgeting decisions [2] [3] [5]. Aid groups warn that misinformation about humanitarian supplies can jeopardize lifesaving programs in conflict zones and incentivize political moves that disrupt assistance [9] [10].
Bottom line: credible reporting documents that condoms have been used in the past as simple floatation for incendiary devices launched from Gaza [1], but multiple fact‑checks and aid organizations found no evidence that U.S. funds purchased condoms that were then used by Hamas as bombs, nor that $50 million was earmarked for such a purpose [2] [3] [5].