Who were the five Israelis detained on 9/11 and what evidence linked them to the attacks?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Five young Israeli men—identified in contemporaneous reporting as employees of Urban Moving Systems and later named in various accounts as Oded Ellner and four colleagues—were detained by U.S. authorities on Sept. 11, 2001 after being seen near Manhattan in a van filming and behaving in ways witnesses described as “puzzling,” and they were questioned on immigration violations and suspected intelligence links; official and journalistic records show evidence that prompted detention (their nationality, location, videotaping, possession of box cutters, overstayed visas, and employer ties) but no public, verified proof that they planned or aided the attacks [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Who the five were and how they were found
Police stopped a white van owned by Urban Moving Systems on a New Jersey service road hours after the attacks and found five men in their early-to-late 20s who identified themselves as Israeli citizens; reporting from ABC and The New York Times described the stop, the men’s nationality, and that they had been seen on the West Side Highway earlier that morning near the World Trade Center [1] [2].
2. What investigators observed and seized that raised suspicion
Witness and police reports recorded that the men had been filming the smoking skyline from a van roof and—according to multiple accounts—were seen acting in a way some witnesses later characterized as celebratory; authorities reportedly seized box cutters and cameras from the vehicle, items that fed early suspicion given the nature of the attacks [4] [3].
3. Immigration charges, detention, and deportation—official handling
Rather than being charged with terrorism in public records, the five were detained on immigration-related offenses such as overstaying visas and other violations; The New York Times and Justice Department materials show the detainees faced deportation proceedings and were held for weeks before being returned to Israel, with U.S. officials ultimately denying publicly available evidence of involvement in the attacks [2] [5].
4. Allegations of intelligence links and the competing evidence
Conspiracy-minded accounts and some later writers have alleged Mossad involvement or foreknowledge, pointing to the men’s nationality, their employer’s purported connections, and the fact that at least two of the group had prior Israeli military service; other contemporaneous and later reporting, including U.S. agency summaries and mainstream outlets, found only circumstantial indicators—location, videotaping, suspicious behavior—and not verified links proving espionage or complicity in 9/11 [6] [4] [7].
5. Public statements, confessions, and the persistence of the story
After repatriation several of the men appeared on Israeli television and explained they were documenting the attacks for their employer; some later interviews and secondary investigations have produced admissions of suspicious behavior or wrongdoing but not admissions of being part of the 9/11 plot, and independent watchdogs and major newspapers have concluded the evidence publicly disclosed does not substantiate claims that they were spies who fomented or assisted the attacks [4] [8] [2].
6. Why the case fueled conspiracy theories and what motives shaped coverage
The combination of dramatic imagery, the men’s nationality, seizure of box cutters, rapid deportation, and early statements from victims’ families created fertile ground for conspiracies amplified by outlets with differing agendas: some investigators and publications promoted theories of Israeli foreknowledge or Mossad operation, while civil liberties and mainstream sources emphasized lack of corroborating evidence and warned against scapegoating Jewish people—a tension documented in analyses of anti‑Semitic 9/11 conspiracies and in mainstream debunking [7] [4] [3].
7. Bottom line from the sources
Contemporaneous police and press records establish who the five detainees were, where they were found, what they were carrying, and that they worked for Urban Moving Systems; those facts explain why authorities detained them and why the episode became notorious, but the publicly available investigative record cited in major outlets does not contain verified evidence linking them to planning or facilitating the Sept. 11 attacks—claims of Mossad involvement remain unproven in the sources provided [1] [2] [4] [6].