Did Hamas committ mass sexual assault on 10/7/2023?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Credible international investigators and multiple rights groups have concluded that conflict-related sexual violence — including rape, gang rape, forced nudity and sexual mutilation — occurred during the Hamas-led attacks of 7 October 2023, though exact numbers and full forensic confirmation remain limited by chaotic conditions and gaps in evidence collection [1] [2] [3]. At the same time, some individual, widely circulated accounts were later challenged or debunked, and Hamas has denied responsibility for sexual crimes, so the record contains both strong indications of systematic sexual violence and areas of uncertainty about scale and specific incidents [4] [5].
1. What investigators found: multiple institutions report sexual violence
United Nations investigators and the UN Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict reported “reasonable grounds” to believe that rape and gang-rape occurred in multiple locations during the 7 October attacks and that there was convincing information some hostages had been subjected to sexual violence and sexualized torture [1] [6]. Human Rights Watch concluded that Palestinian armed groups involved in the assault committed a range of violations amounting to war crimes, explicitly including crimes relating to sexual and gender-based violence [2]. Independent teams of researchers and legal experts — including a New York Times probe and specialized projects such as the Dinah Project and West Point’s symposium — documented incidents across several sites and described forced nudity, rape, gang rape and mutilation in survivor, witness, medical and video evidence they examined [7] [3] [8].
2. Evidence types, limitations and forensic challenges
Investigators relied on a mix of survivor testimony, witness accounts from first responders, recovered video and photographs, autopsy reports cited by Israeli authorities, and testimonies from some captured militants — but many reports underscore the difficulty of definitive forensic documentation because of the extreme violence, ongoing hostilities, delayed access to scenes, and the trauma of survivors that limited interviews [7] [6] [9]. Several organizations cautioned that not every physical injury or mutilation is legally straightforward to classify as sexual violence without corroborating forensic and testimonial evidence, and international legal standards require careful categorization of acts against sexual violence definitions [3].
3. The contested terrain: denials, debunked claims and political contestation
Hamas has denied involvement in sexual assaults, and some high-profile initial accounts proved inaccurate, which has fueled disputes and propaganda battles over the narrative [4] [10]. Reporting outlets and human-rights bodies have noted both robust evidence of sexual crimes and specific instances where claims could not be substantiated; several reputable outlets nonetheless found enough corroboration across sites to characterize sexual violence as part of the broader pattern of atrocities on that day [11] [9]. Amnesty, Human Rights Watch and later national and academic reports framed these acts within potential war crimes or crimes against humanity even as they warned of evidentiary gaps and the need for criminal investigations [5] [2] [12].
4. Conclusion: did Hamas commit mass sexual assault on 7 October?
The weight of reporting and investigation by UN authorities, major human-rights organizations, forensic-research teams and investigative journalists indicates that sexual violence — including rape, gang rape and sexualized mutilation — occurred in multiple locations during the 7 October attacks and that Palestinian armed groups led by Hamas participated in the assault where such acts took place; several bodies of work now treat those acts as war crimes or components of crimes against humanity pending judicial adjudication [1] [2] [7] [5]. However, precisely quantifying the number of victims, assigning individual criminal responsibility in every case, and resolving disputed or debunked anecdotes requires further forensic investigations and legal processes; reporting to date establishes reasonable grounds and significant evidence of systematic sexual violence but also documents contested claims and evidentiary limits [6] [4] [3].