Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How did later Vietnam draft lotteries differ from 1969?
Executive summary
The 1969 draft lottery reintroduced random selection after years of age-priority rules and was conducted by drawing 366 birth-date capsules on December 1, 1969; that draw covered men born 1944–1950 and produced a highest-called number of 195 for 1970 inductions [1] [2]. Subsequent lotteries (1970, 1971, 1972 and later tables) used the same capsule drawing method but applied to single birth years, were reportedly “more randomized” by some accounts, and some later lotteries were never used to call men because draft calls ended after 1972 [3] [2] [1].
1. What changed in 1969 — the reform that set the pattern
The essential reform in 1969 was moving from the pre-1969 system that favored older registrants toward a national, random lottery based on birthdays; Congress modified the Military Selective Service Act and President Nixon authorized a lottery, implemented December 1, 1969, to determine the 1970 “order of call” [4] [1]. The ceremony was public — 366 blue plastic capsules containing dates were drawn live on radio/TV — which made the process highly visible and politicized [5] [6].
2. How the later lotteries differed in scope and timing
Unlike the wide 1944–1950 cohort covered in the December 1969 drawing, subsequent lotteries covered single birth years: July 1, 1970 for men born in 1951, August 5, 1971 for those born in 1952, and a 1972 table for 1953 births [2] [3]. That narrowing of scope meant each later draw assigned numbers only within a single cohort rather than across a seven-year band as the original 1969 lottery had done [2] [3].
3. Randomness and controversy: 1969 versus later draws
The 1969 lottery was widely criticized for apparent nonrandomness — statisticians and politicians challenged its randomness and called for hearings after observed patterns suggested poor mixing of capsules [7] [2]. Later lotteries are described in some accounts as having been “apparently fully randomized,” and proponents say the later draws corrected flaws identified in 1969; those sources state the 1969 results were not changed despite criticism [3] [7]. Available sources do not mention technical details of the specific procedural changes used to improve mixing in later draws beyond assertions that subsequent lotteries were more randomized (not found in current reporting).
4. Who the later lotteries affected — and who they never called
Later lotteries assigned numbers to younger cohorts but, by the time of the 1972 and 1973 tables, the draft wound down: no new draft orders were issued after 1972 and the authority to induct expired June 30, 1973, so some later tables were never used to call men to service [2] [1]. One source notes the final draft call was December 7, 1972, and that tables produced for later years (including a 1973 conduct) did not result in new inductions [1] [2].
5. Practical effects: highest numbers called and public reaction
For the 1969 lottery the highest lottery number actually called for induction was 195, meaning not every low number resulted in induction that year — and that reality repeated in later years with different highest-called numbers for each cohort [2] [3]. The visible flaws in the 1969 draw strengthened anti-draft sentiment and produced calls for reform; the public, hearing live draws, experienced the lottery as a dramatized, often contentious event [5] [7].
6. Longer-term context: policy goals and the shift to volunteer force
Nixon framed the lottery as part of a strategy to equalize draft risk, change order-of-call priorities (youngest first), and ultimately move toward an all-volunteer force; Congress’s 1969 modifications gave the president authority to alter selection rules, enabling the lottery and later changes [8] [4]. As manpower needs dropped, the system phased out — registration ended and the draft was effectively dissolved as the military shifted to volunteers after the Vietnam era [4] [3].
Conclusion — what to take away
The headline difference is that the 1969 lottery was a large, cross-cohort spectacle that produced detectable randomness problems and strong political backlash; later lotteries applied the same mechanics to single birth years, were judged by some sources to have been better randomized, and ultimately many of the later tables never translated into new inductees because the draft ended after 1972 [7] [3] [2]. Where sources assert improved randomness they do not always specify precise procedural fixes, and available reporting does not detail every technical change made between 1969 and subsequent draws (not found in current reporting).