How many drone strikes occurred under Donald Trump (2017-2021)?

Checked on November 29, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Estimates of how many drone strikes occurred under President Donald Trump (2017–2021) vary widely across trackers and news reports; published counts in the provided sources include figures such as 2,243 strikes in Trump’s first two years (per the Bureau of Investigative Journalism as reported by BBC) and other compilations that put Trump-era strikes at several hundred to a few thousand depending on methodology and theaters counted [1] [2] [3]. Available sources do not provide a single definitive, administration-wide total that all trackers agree on; different outlets count strikes in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and maritime operations differently [4] [3].

1. What the public numbers show: multiple tallies, multiple methods

One widely cited figure is 2,243 drone strikes during Trump’s first two years, a number attributed to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and reported in BBC coverage — a total that includes strikes across multiple theaters and that the BBC presented to illustrate how the program expanded early in Trump’s tenure [1]. Other reporting assembles smaller but still substantial counts: a Daily Beast analysis cited by Truthout found 238 drone strikes in 2017–2018 alone [2], while Business Insider reported “208 such airstrikes” over Trump’s full single term in one compilation — showing how even reputable outlets can arrive at divergent totals depending on scope and definitions [5].

2. Why totals diverge: scope, definitions and secrecy

Counts differ because some trackers include strikes by the US military only, others include CIA operations; some include strikes in declared war zones (e.g., Afghanistan) while others focus on “outside war zones”; some count counter‑terror airstrikes and naval/maritime strikes together, and some exclude raids and ground actions [4] [3]. The Trump administration also changed reporting practices — revoking an Obama-era report requirement and designating large areas as “active hostilities” — which reduced mandatory disclosures and complicates independent tallying [6] [1] [4].

3. Geographic shifts matter: Yemen, Somalia and Afghanistan

Multiple sources show the Trump era involved a geographic shift in where strikes predominated. Analysts and NGOs documented a movement away from Pakistan and toward Yemen and Somalia, and an escalation in Afghanistan and the Syria/Iraq theaters at various points, making aggregate counts sensitive to which country datasets are included [4] [3] [7]. For example, New America and other trackers note that strikes in Somalia peaked under Trump and then fell, while Afghanistan strikes surged during his announced strategy changes [7] [3].

4. Civilian‑casualty reporting and transparency declined

The Trump administration revoked the Obama executive order that required CIA civilian‑casualty summaries and designated broad areas as “active hostilities,” which exempted many strikes from prior disclosure rules; reporters and human‑rights groups say that reduced transparency made independent verification harder and contributed to widely varying strike tallies [6] [1] [4]. Rights groups and legal analysts have also argued the policy changes loosened targeting constraints, which further complicates assessing the scale and consequences of the campaign from open sources [8].

5. Competing interpretations: surge versus continuity

Some commentators and outlets frame the numbers as a clear “surge” under Trump — pointing to higher yearly strike counts and increased activity in multiple theaters [3] [2]. Others, including analysts cited in War on the Rocks, argue that the program largely continued prior patterns but shifted theaters, and that headline “surge” claims depend on how strikes are counted and which years are compared [4]. Both perspectives rely on the same partial datasets; the disagreement is methodological and political.

6. What can be stated with confidence

Available sources agree on these key points: Trump loosened reporting rules and reclassified areas to reduce transparency [1] [4]; independent tallies show substantially more reported strikes in several theaters during his early presidency than in comparable Obama years [2] [3]; and different trackers produce widely different totals because of methodological differences and secrecy [1] [4].

7. What remains uncertain and why

No single authoritative, fully transparent count for all U.S. drone strikes during 2017–2021 appears in the provided sources. The precise total depends on which actors (military vs. CIA), geographies (Afghanistan/declared war zones vs. outside war zones), and types of strikes (air, maritime, counter‑terror, special operations) are included — and the Trump administration’s policy choices reduced the public record that would make one number definitive [1] [4].

If you want, I can compile the different trackers’ counts side‑by‑side (Bureau of Investigative Journalism, New America, The Daily Beast, Business Insider, Chicago Sun‑Times, etc.) from these sources so you can see precisely how methodology drives the range of totals cited [1] [7] [2] [5] [9].

Want to dive deeper?
How does the number of US drone strikes under Trump compare to Obama and Biden?
Which countries and regions saw the most US drone strikes between 2017 and 2021?
What definitions and sources report counts of US drone strikes during the Trump administration?
How did Trump administration policy and authorization change US drone strike frequency?
What civilian casualty estimates exist for drone strikes carried out from 2017 to 2021?