Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: What is the Insurrection Act and how does it relate to National Guard federalization?

Checked on June 9, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a federal law that gives the U.S. president extraordinary powers to deploy military forces domestically and federalize National Guard units in specific circumstances [1]. Before exercising these powers, the president must issue a proclamation ordering insurgents to disperse [2]. The Act serves as a notable exception to the Posse Comitatus Act, which typically restricts military involvement in domestic law enforcement [3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial contextual elements were missing from the original question:

  • The Act has been used sparingly throughout history, with notable deployments during the 1992 Los Angeles riots and Hurricane Hugo in 1989 [2], as well as by presidents Lincoln, Grant, and George H.W. Bush [4].
  • The National Guard typically operates under a unique dual status system - state governors usually maintain control during domestic support missions, allowing them to perform law enforcement functions that would be prohibited under federal control [5].
  • The law contains problematic broad language and hasn't been substantially updated in over 150 years, leading experts to recommend reforms to prevent potential presidential abuse [6].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question doesn't acknowledge several important aspects that could affect public understanding:

  • Power dynamics: The broad authority granted by the Act benefits the executive branch significantly, as it gives presidents extensive power with minimal checks and balances [6].
  • State vs. Federal Control: There's an inherent tension between state and federal authority. Governors benefit from maintaining control of their National Guard units, while presidents benefit from the power to federalize these forces [5].
  • Historical Context: While the question treats this as a contemporary issue, it's important to note that this is a centuries-old law [4] that has shaped federal-state relations throughout American history.
Want to dive deeper?
When has the Insurrection Act been invoked throughout US history?
What are the legal requirements for a president to federalize the National Guard?
How does the Posse Comitatus Act interact with the Insurrection Act?
What is the difference between state-controlled and federalized National Guard units?
Can governors refuse federal orders to deploy their National Guard units?